• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Avesis
  • Dokümanı Olmayanlar
  • Makale
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Avesis
  • Dokümanı Olmayanlar
  • Makale
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Decompression Illness Medically Reported by Hyperbaric Treatment Facilities: Cluster Analysis of 1929 Cases

Date
2010
Author
Balestra, Costantino
Aydin, Salih
Denoble, Petar
Vann, Richard
Marroni, Alessandro
ÖZYİĞİT, TAMER
EGİ, SALİH MURAT
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
introduction: The term decompression illness (DCI) describes maladies resulting from inadequate decompression, but there is little consensus concerning clinically useful DO subclasses. Our aim was to explore an objective DO classification using multivariate statistics to assess naturally associated clusters of DO manifestations. We also evaluated their mapping onto other DO classifications and investigated the association with therapeutic outcome. Methods: We defined the optimal number of clusters using "two-step" cluster analysis and Bayesian information criterion with confirmation by hierarchical clustering with squared Euclidian distances and Ward's method.,The data were 1929 DCI cases reported by hyperbaric chambers to the Divers Alert Network (DAN America) from 1999-2003. Results: Four robust and highly significant clusters of DO manifestations were demonstrated containing 300, 741, 333, and 555 patients. Each cluster had characteristic manifestations. Cluster 1 was effectively pain only. For Cluster 2, characteristic manifestations included numbness, paresthesia, and decreased skin sensitivity; for Cluster 3, malaise, paralysis, muscular weakness, and bladder-bowel dysfunction; and for Cluster 4, hearing loss, localized skin swelling, tinnitus, skin rash and mottling, confusion, dyspnea/chokes, muscular problems, vision problems, altered consciousness, headache, vertigo, nausea, fatigue, dizziness, and abnormal sensations. Discussion: Internal reliability was confirmed by arbitrarily dividing the dataset into two parts and repeating the analysis. The clusters mapped poorly onto traditional DCI categories (AGE, Type I DCS, Type II DCS), but more specifically onto the Perceived Severity Index (PSI). All three classification methods (DCI, Cluster, PSI) predicted complete relief of manifestations equally well. We conclude that Cluster analysis is an objective method for classifying DO manifestations independent of clinical judgment.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/79532
https://doi.org/10.3357/asem.2495.2010
Collections
  • Makale [92796]

Creative Commons Lisansı

İstanbul Üniversitesi Akademik Arşiv Sistemi (ilgili içerikte aksi belirtilmediği sürece) Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 


Hakkımızda
Açık Erişim PolitikasıVeri Giriş Rehberleriİletişim
sherpa/romeo
Dergi Adı/ISSN || Yayıncı

Exact phrase only All keywords Any

BaşlıkbaşlayaniçerenISSN

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypes

My Account

LoginRegister

Creative Commons Lisansı

İstanbul Üniversitesi Akademik Arşiv Sistemi (ilgili içerikte aksi belirtilmediği sürece) Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV