Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBalestra, Costantino
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Salih
dc.contributor.authorDenoble, Petar
dc.contributor.authorVann, Richard
dc.contributor.authorMarroni, Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorÖZYİĞİT, TAMER
dc.contributor.authorEGİ, SALİH MURAT
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T11:42:06Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T11:42:06Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationÖZYİĞİT T., EGİ S. M. , Denoble P., Balestra C., Aydin S., Vann R., Marroni A., "Decompression Illness Medically Reported by Hyperbaric Treatment Facilities: Cluster Analysis of 1929 Cases", AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, cilt.81, sa.1, ss.3-7, 2010
dc.identifier.issn0095-6562
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_73ac5ff8-fa2f-446f-bb0c-7f516c2530c2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/79532
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3357/asem.2495.2010
dc.description.abstractintroduction: The term decompression illness (DCI) describes maladies resulting from inadequate decompression, but there is little consensus concerning clinically useful DO subclasses. Our aim was to explore an objective DO classification using multivariate statistics to assess naturally associated clusters of DO manifestations. We also evaluated their mapping onto other DO classifications and investigated the association with therapeutic outcome. Methods: We defined the optimal number of clusters using "two-step" cluster analysis and Bayesian information criterion with confirmation by hierarchical clustering with squared Euclidian distances and Ward's method.,The data were 1929 DCI cases reported by hyperbaric chambers to the Divers Alert Network (DAN America) from 1999-2003. Results: Four robust and highly significant clusters of DO manifestations were demonstrated containing 300, 741, 333, and 555 patients. Each cluster had characteristic manifestations. Cluster 1 was effectively pain only. For Cluster 2, characteristic manifestations included numbness, paresthesia, and decreased skin sensitivity; for Cluster 3, malaise, paralysis, muscular weakness, and bladder-bowel dysfunction; and for Cluster 4, hearing loss, localized skin swelling, tinnitus, skin rash and mottling, confusion, dyspnea/chokes, muscular problems, vision problems, altered consciousness, headache, vertigo, nausea, fatigue, dizziness, and abnormal sensations. Discussion: Internal reliability was confirmed by arbitrarily dividing the dataset into two parts and repeating the analysis. The clusters mapped poorly onto traditional DCI categories (AGE, Type I DCS, Type II DCS), but more specifically onto the Perceived Severity Index (PSI). All three classification methods (DCI, Cluster, PSI) predicted complete relief of manifestations equally well. We conclude that Cluster analysis is an objective method for classifying DO manifestations independent of clinical judgment.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectSosyoloji
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectSPOR BİLİMLERİ
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectTIP, GENEL & İÇECEK
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler (SOC)
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler Genel
dc.subjectKAMU, ÇEVRE VE İŞ SAĞLIĞI
dc.titleDecompression Illness Medically Reported by Hyperbaric Treatment Facilities: Cluster Analysis of 1929 Cases
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalAVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
dc.contributor.departmentGalatasaray Üniversitesi , Mühendislik Ve Teknoloji Fakültesi , Bilgisayar Yazılımı
dc.identifier.volume81
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage3
dc.identifier.endpage7
dc.contributor.firstauthorID194788


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record