Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLoop, T.
dc.contributor.authorKarzai, W.
dc.contributor.authorKrassler, J.
dc.contributor.authorLicker, M. J.
dc.contributor.authorde Abreu, M. Gama
dc.contributor.authorSenturk, M.
dc.contributor.authorRossaint, R.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, M. J.
dc.contributor.authorNeto, A. Serpa
dc.contributor.authorSevergnini, P.
dc.contributor.authorSzegedi, L.
dc.contributor.authorVegh, T.
dc.contributor.authorVoyagis, G.
dc.contributor.authorZhong, J.
dc.contributor.authorKiss, T.
dc.contributor.authorWittenstein, J.
dc.contributor.authorBecker, C.
dc.contributor.authorBirr, K.
dc.contributor.authorCinnella, G.
dc.contributor.authorCohen, E.
dc.contributor.authorEl Tahan, M. R.
dc.contributor.authorFalcao, L. F.
dc.contributor.authorGregoretti, C.
dc.contributor.authorGranell, M.
dc.contributor.authorHachenberg, T.
dc.contributor.authorHollmann, M. W.
dc.contributor.authorMarczin, N.
dc.contributor.authorMills, G. H.
dc.contributor.authorMurrell, M. T.
dc.contributor.authorNeskovic, V.
dc.contributor.authorNisnevitch-Savarese, Z.
dc.contributor.authorPelosi, P.
dc.contributor.authorJankovic, R.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T17:55:07Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T17:55:07Z
dc.identifier.citationKiss T., Wittenstein J., Becker C., Birr K., Cinnella G., Cohen E., El Tahan M. R. , Falcao L. F. , Gregoretti C., Granell M., et al., "Protective ventilation with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery (PROTHOR): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial", TRIALS, cilt.20, 2019
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_87f3e73a-d730-4a0e-a093-376ecb093822
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/92299
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3208-8
dc.description.abstractBackground: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) may result in longer duration of in-hospital stay and even mortality. Both thoracic surgery and intraoperative mechanical ventilation settings add considerably to the risk of PPC. It is unclear if one-lung ventilation (OLV) for thoracic surgery with a strategy of intraoperative high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuvers (RM) reduces PPC, compared to low PEEP without RM.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectTıbbi Ekoloji ve Hidroklimatoloji
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectTIP, ARAŞTIRMA VE DENEYSEL
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.titleProtective ventilation with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery (PROTHOR): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalTRIALS
dc.contributor.departmentImperial College London , ,
dc.identifier.volume20
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2203922


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record