Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorMumcu, Emre
dc.contributor.authorCekici, ALİ
dc.contributor.authorBilhan, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T18:40:26Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T18:40:26Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationMumcu E., Bilhan H., Cekici A., "Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting Fixed Restorations", JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, cilt.37, ss.549-558, 2011
dc.identifier.issn0160-6972
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_8bee099f-bae9-49e1-bd7f-a72cb2aec87e
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/94688
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-10-00018
dc.description.abstractA key criterion of success following dental implants is the marginal bone level. Long-term clinical and radiographic evaluation is necessary to test the results of in vitro studies investigating how cantilevering of restorations or implant size affect bone level changes around implants. There is no consensus on the effect of several variables such as age, gender, implant size, and cantilever prostheses on marginal bone levels around fixed dentures supported by dental implants. Patients who received cemented, fixed restorations supported by implants and who were examined in routine recall sessions 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after loading were included in the study group. Comparative bone level measurements were obtained from images of radiographs at x20 magnification using the CorelDraw 11.0 software program. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test and 1-way analysis of variance. In the 36-month observation period, there were no incidences of implant failure, excessive bone loss around implants, or peri-implant inflammation. One hundred twenty-six implants in 36 patients were evaluated, and the effect of several factors on marginal bone loss (MBL) during the 36 months after loading was analyzed statistically. There was no significant relationship between MBL and implant length or diameter, whereas age, gender, and cantilevers affected bone loss rates. MBL was elevated in older and female patients as well as in patients who received cantilevers. In cases of limiting anatomic conditions, short and/or narrow implants should be preferred over cantilever extensions.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.titleMarginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting Fixed Restorations
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume37
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage549
dc.identifier.endpage558
dc.contributor.firstauthorID75503


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster