Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBuyukozturk, Suna
dc.contributor.authorKARAKAYA, GÜL
dc.contributor.authorBavbek, Sevim
dc.contributor.authorUnal, Derya
dc.contributor.authorGelincik, Asli
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Secil Kepil
dc.contributor.authorErkekol, Ferda Oner
dc.contributor.authorDursun, Adile Berna
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T21:04:55Z
dc.date.available2021-03-02T21:04:55Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationOzdemir S. K. , Erkekol F. O. , Unal D., Buyukozturk S., Gelincik A., Dursun A. B. , KARAKAYA G., Bavbek S., "Management of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Retrospective Experience", INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, cilt.171, sa.1, ss.54-60, 2016
dc.identifier.issn1018-2438
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_054aee46-5681-4bd3-b77d-cd5170953663
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/9443
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000450952
dc.description.abstractBackground: We previously reported perfect specificity and low sensitivity of skin tests in proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-induced immediate hypersensitivity reactions in a prospective multicenter study. Here, in a retrospective study, we aimed to further evaluate the diagnostic workup procedures and characteristics of the patients with suspected PPI hypersensitivity. Methods: This national multicenter study was conducted as a retrospective chart review of patients with a history of PPI-induced immediate hypersensitivity reaction. A total of 60 patients were included. Results of diagnostic workup procedures (standardized skin-prick, intradermal, and oral-provocation tests with PPIs) and the characteristics of the patients were analyzed. Results: Lansopra-zole was the most commonly suspected drug with 41 patients (68.3%), followed by pantoprazole in 12 patients (20.0%), esomeprazole in 6 (10.0%), rabeprazole in 4 (6.7%), and omeprazole in 1 (1.7%). Anaphylaxis (40 patients, 66.7%) was the most common clinical presentation followed by urticaria (17 patients, 28.3%). Diagnostic skin tests with the culprit PPI were positive in 13/26 patients (50.0%). Diagnostic oral-provocation tests were negative in 6/8 patients; 5 of these 6 patients had skin test results with the culprit PPI, and all were negative. Ten patients had at least 1 cross-reactivity. Extensive cross-reactivity (between > 2 PPIs) was detected in 4 patients. Conclusions: Lansoprazole was the most frequently implicated drug and anaphylaxis was the most frequent manifestation of PPI-induced hypersensitivity reactions. Physicians should be aware of the possible crossreactivity among PPIs; however, a safe, alternative PPI can usually be detected by a thorough drug allergy workup. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.subjectALERJİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectİmmünoloji
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri (LIFE)
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri
dc.titleManagement of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Retrospective Experience
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentDiskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Research Hospital , ,
dc.identifier.volume171
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage54
dc.identifier.endpage60
dc.contributor.firstauthorID229049


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster