Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTamer, Gulden Sonmez
dc.contributor.authorCagatay, Penbe
dc.contributor.authorWillke, Ayse
dc.contributor.authorSonmez, Nese
dc.contributor.authorBoral, Ozden Buyukbaba
dc.contributor.authorKEÇELİ, SEMA AŞKIN
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T18:25:49Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T18:25:49Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationKEÇELİ S. A. , Willke A., Tamer G. S. , Boral O. B. , Sonmez N., Cagatay P., "Interaction between caspofungin or voriconazole and cefoperazone-sulbactam or piperacillin-tazobactam by in vitro and in vivo methods", APMIS, cilt.122, ss.412-417, 2014
dc.identifier.issn0903-4641
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_8a960fb7-8f9c-4f21-8485-6c924b1b30dd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/93936
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12159
dc.description.abstractImmunosuppressive patients are at risk of fungal and bacterial infections. Therefore, these patients receive prophylactic, preemptive, empirical or target antifungal and concomitant antibiotic therapy. To this end, caspofungin (CAS) or voriconazole (VRC) antifungals and cefoperazone-sulbactam (CPZ/SAM) or piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) antibiotics may be used. Here, we aimed to investigate the interaction between these antifungals and antibiotics by in vitro and in vivo methods. The interaction was tested by chequerboard analysis and fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). It was also tested in a neutropenic mice-invasive candidiasis model and evaluated by fungal burden in kidney tissue of infected animals from the first day to the fifth day of treatment with 24h intervals. A synergism was detected between CAS and CPZ/SAM (FICI=0.1) and PIP/TAZ (FICI=0.3). Fungal burden in tissues of drug-treated mice was reduced compared with controls in a time-dependent manner. In comparison with CAS-alone treated group, there were 1.32log(10) reductions of fungal burden in CAS+CPZ/SAM (p=0.002) and in CAS+PIP/TAZ group (p=0.14). The same interactions were not found with VRC and antibiotics. CPZ/SAM had stronger synergistic interaction with CAS than PIP/TAZ. The mechanism of synergism is not well understood. This is most likely due to an increase in the anticandidal effect of CAS plus antibiotics.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectBiyokimya
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectPatoloji
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectBiyoloji ve Biyokimya
dc.subjectPATOLOJİ
dc.subjectMikrobiyoloji
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri (LIFE)
dc.subjectİmmünoloji
dc.titleInteraction between caspofungin or voriconazole and cefoperazone-sulbactam or piperacillin-tazobactam by in vitro and in vivo methods
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalAPMIS
dc.contributor.departmentKocaeli Üniversitesi , Tıp Fakültesi , Temel Tıp Bilimleri
dc.identifier.volume122
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage412
dc.identifier.endpage417
dc.contributor.firstauthorID27336


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster