Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKizilkaya, E
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T13:29:44Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T13:29:44Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citationKizilkaya E., "The changing attitude of Terence Wilmot Hutchison in his ultra-empiricist proclivity", EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, cilt.51, sa.7, ss.811-822, 2003
dc.identifier.issn0013-3035
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_7caeb776-3358-44fa-a0f7-8232a871d3a5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/85260
dc.description.abstractWith his 1938 work, Terence Wilmot Hutchison established the first link between the methodology of economics and philosophy of science. Hutchison's aim is to found a hardcore for the economics, and with this purpose he brings to the economic analysis testability and falsifiability criterions. In the course of time, there is also a changing attitude in his ultra-empiricist proclivity and tolerance towards historical-institutional phenomenons. An example, from the Ahmed Guner Sayar's correspondence to Hutchison, aims to shed light to the background of this intellectual change how to theorise economic analysis. It's an important chance to appreciate Hutchison's original ideas. Thus it's not surprising that he had rejected Sayar's dual-raying theory as it is not quantifiable, but he had also tolerated the existence of some analytical propositions to understand social phenomenon.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectEkonomi ve İş
dc.subjectİktisat
dc.subjectSosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectEKONOMİ
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler (SOC)
dc.titleThe changing attitude of Terence Wilmot Hutchison in his ultra-empiricist proclivity
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalEKONOMICKY CASOPIS
dc.contributor.department, ,
dc.identifier.volume51
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.startpage811
dc.identifier.endpage822
dc.contributor.firstauthorID166947


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record