Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHowell, FC
dc.contributor.authorPigati, J
dc.contributor.authorQuade, J
dc.contributor.authorJuell, KE
dc.contributor.authorAchyuthan, H
dc.contributor.authorArsebuk, G
dc.contributor.authorJosephson, SC
dc.contributor.authorStiner, MC
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T13:03:24Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T13:03:24Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.citationStiner M., Achyuthan H., Arsebuk G., Howell F., Josephson S., Juell K., Pigati J., Quade J., "Reconstructing cave bear paleoecology from skeletons: a cross-disciplinary study of middle Pleistocene bears from Yarimburgaz Cave, Turkey", PALEOBIOLOGY, cilt.24, sa.1, ss.74-98, 1998
dc.identifier.issn0094-8373
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_7a69e28c-f133-4fc5-a79e-4c9ed226c7cb
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/83863
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300019989
dc.description.abstractCave bears, an extinct subgenus (Spelearctos) of Ursus, were versatile enough to inhabit large areas of the northern hemisphere during the middle and late Pleistocene, yet they had evolved a specialized dentition that emphasized grinding functions, implying a heavy dietary reliance on tough, fibrous foods (i.e., plants). Isotope studies have yielded conflicting results on cave bear diet, however, often without consideration of the provenance of the samples or the possible contradictions that taphonomic and morphologic evidence might pose to dietary interpretations. It is likely that cave bear habits varied somewhat in response to environmental circumstance, and the limits on their abilities to do so remain unknown. If the larger goal of paleontological inquiry is to reconstruct the adaptations of cave bear species, then variation and commonalities among populations must be tracked closely and the disparate lines of evidence currently available examined together on a case by case basis. Clearly, no single analytical technique can achieve this. By way of example we present the results of a cross-disciplinary collaboration that combines osteometric, isotopic, and taphonomic approaches to studying the paleoecology of a bear assemblage from Yarimburgaz Cave in northwest Turkey. Reference information on the linkages between diet, hibernation, and population structure in modern bears provides test implications for the investigation. Osteometric techniques demonstrate the presence of two coextant middle Pleistocene bear species in the sample - Ursus (Spelearctos) deningeri, a form of cave bear, and U. arctos or brown bear - the former abundant in the sample, the latter rare. An attritional mortality pattern for the bears and the condition of their bones show that most or all of the animals died in the cave from nonviolent causes in the context of hibernation.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectMühendislik ve Teknoloji
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri
dc.subjectBİYOLOJİK ÇEŞİTLİLİĞİN KORUNMASI
dc.subjectÇevre / Ekoloji
dc.subjectTarım ve Çevre Bilimleri (AGE)
dc.subjectEKOLOJİ
dc.subjectEVRİMSEL BİYOLOJİ
dc.subjectBiyoloji ve Biyokimya
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri (LIFE)
dc.subjectPALEONTOLOJİ
dc.subjectYerbilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler (SCI)
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectBiyokimya
dc.subjectTarımsal Bilimler
dc.subjectÇevre Mühendisliği
dc.subjectÇevre Teknolojisi
dc.subjectAtıksuların Toplanması ve Arıtımı
dc.subjectEkoloji ve Kirlenme
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.titleReconstructing cave bear paleoecology from skeletons: a cross-disciplinary study of middle Pleistocene bears from Yarimburgaz Cave, Turkey
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalPALEOBIOLOGY
dc.contributor.department, ,
dc.identifier.volume24
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage74
dc.identifier.endpage98
dc.contributor.firstauthorID121838


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record