Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDincol, M. E.
dc.contributor.authorDaglaroglu, R.
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, B.
dc.contributor.authorErsev, Handan
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T20:40:11Z
dc.date.available2021-03-02T20:40:11Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationErsev H., Yilmaz B., Dincol M. E. , Daglaroglu R., "The efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment instrumentation to remove single gutta-percha cones cemented with several endodontic sealers", INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, cilt.45, sa.8, ss.756-762, 2012
dc.identifier.issn0143-2885
dc.identifier.otherav_03262cae-1282-45c0-a497-b2895161828d
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/8060
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02032.x
dc.description.abstractErsev H, Yilmaz B, Dincol ME, Daglaroglu R. The efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment instrumentation to remove single gutta-percha cones cemented with several endodontic sealers. International Endodontic Journal, 45, 756762, 2012. Abstract Aim To evaluate residual root filling material following removal of three newly developed root canal sealers used with a matched-taper single-cone root filling technique and to compare the efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment instruments with that of a conventional manual technique. Methodology The canals of 120 palatal roots in maxillary molar teeth were instrumented with EndoWave nickeltitanium rotary instruments and filled using Hybrid Root SEAL, EndoSequence BC Sealer, Activ GP system or AH Plus with matched-taper single gutta-percha cones. The root fillings were then removed with ProTaper Universal retreatment rotary instruments or a manual technique. Buccolingual and proximal digital radiographs of the roots were exposed to determine the area of remaining filling material in the coronal, middle and apical thirds. The area percentages of remaining filling material in each third and total canal area were calculated. Data were analysed statistically with KruskalWallis and MannWhitney U-tests. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Results Irrespective of the sealer type and retreatment technique, filling material could not be removed completely from the root canals. Significantly, more remaining filling material was observed in the apical third (P < 0.05). When comparing the sealers, the only significant difference was detected between AH Plus/manual and Activ GP/manual groups with respect to residual material in the total canal area (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between manual and ProTaper groups. Conclusions When using gross radiographic criteria, the Activ GP was more effectively removed from root canals than AH Plus with hand instrumentation. Hybrid Root SEAL, EndoSequence BC Sealer and AH Plus were removed to a similar extent. ProTaper Universal retreatment instruments were as safe and effective as hand instruments in reaching the working length.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.titleThe efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment instrumentation to remove single gutta-percha cones cemented with several endodontic sealers
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi , Endodonti
dc.identifier.volume45
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.startpage756
dc.identifier.endpage762
dc.contributor.firstauthorID54299


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record