Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKanmaz, Bedii
dc.contributor.authorAygun, Aslan
dc.contributor.authorKabasakal, Levent
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Emre
dc.contributor.authorAraman, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorOcak, Meltem
dc.contributor.authorTutar, Rumeysa O.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T09:38:23Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T09:38:23Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationOcak M., Demirci E., Kabasakal L., Aygun A., Tutar R. O. , Araman A., Kanmaz B., "Evaluation and comparison of Ga-68 DOTA-TATE and Ga-68 DOTA-NOC PET/CT imaging in well-differentiated thyroid cancer", NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, cilt.34, sa.11, ss.1084-1089, 2013
dc.identifier.issn0143-3636
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_69247eb0-c886-4144-9efc-7c55497f6ec0
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/72869
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/mnm.0b013e328364eaab
dc.description.abstractBackgroundSomatostatin receptor (Sstr) scintigraphy with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues has been used extensively for the diagnosis and therapy of Sstr-expressing tumours. It has been shown that well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) cells have a high expression of Sstr2, Sstr3 and Sstr5. Hence, WDTC cells could be an ideal target for the evaluation of lesion uptake of Ga-68 DOTA-1-NaI3-octreotide (DOTA-NOC), which has a high affinity not only to Sstr2 but also to Sstr3 and Sstr5. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the value of Ga-68 DOTA-NOC as a target for Sstr2-expressing, Sstr3-expressing and Sstr5-expressing tumours in WDTC patients and to compare the results with those of Ga-68 DOTA-TATE in the same patient population.MethodThirteen patients with WDTC were included in our study: nine with papillary thyroid cancer, three with Hurthle cell carcinoma and one with follicular thyroid carcinoma. All patients had elevated serum thyroglobulin levels and negative post-therapeutic I-131 whole-body scans, which were obtained after the last radioiodine treatment. All patients had undergone two consecutive PET imaging studies with Ga-68 DOTA-d-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotate (DOTA-TATE) and Ga-68 DOTA-NOC, respectively. All images were evaluated visually, and maximum standardized uptake values were calculated.ResultsBoth Ga-68 DOTA-TATE and Ga-68 DOTA-NOC PET images gave comparable results. Among the 13 patients, imaging with both Ga-68 DOTA-TATE and Ga-68 DOTA-NOC gave negative results in five (38%) patients and positive results in eight (62%) patients. A total of 45 lesions were identified on Ga-68 DOTA-TATE images and 42 on Ga-68 DOTA-NOC images; three lesions were missed. Lesion uptake was significantly higher on Ga-68 DOTA-TATE images. Maximum standardized uptake values of Ga-68 DOTA-TATE and Ga-68 DOTA-NOC were 12.99.1 and 6.3 +/- 4.1 (n=54, P<0.001), respectively.ConclusionOur study suggested that Ga-68 DOTA-TATE has a higher lesion uptake even in WDTC patients and may have potential advantage over Ga-68 DOTA-NOC. (C) 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectRADYOLOJİ, NÜKLEER TIP ve MEDİKAL GÖRÜNTÜLEME
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectNükleer Tıp
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.titleEvaluation and comparison of Ga-68 DOTA-TATE and Ga-68 DOTA-NOC PET/CT imaging in well-differentiated thyroid cancer
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalNUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume34
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.startpage1084
dc.identifier.endpage1089
dc.contributor.firstauthorID12607


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record