Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGuney, N.
dc.contributor.authorSakar, B.
dc.contributor.authorGumus, M.
dc.contributor.authorArgon, A.
dc.contributor.authorUstuner, Z.
dc.contributor.authorUstaoglu, M. A.
dc.contributor.authorSaglam, S.
dc.contributor.authorTenekeci, A. N.
dc.contributor.authorAykan, N. F.
dc.contributor.authorBasaran, M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T09:32:57Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T09:32:57Z
dc.identifier.citationSakar B., Gumus M., Basaran M., Argon A., Ustuner Z., Ustaoglu M. A. , Saglam S., Guney N., Tenekeci A. N. , Aykan N. F. , "XELOX followed by XELIRI or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer", ONCOLOGY, cilt.73, ss.298-304, 2007
dc.identifier.issn0030-2414
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_68c05bd4-550d-4878-a37a-0e909d139b3f
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/72595
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000132395
dc.description.abstractBackground: Capecitabine has demonstrated high efficacy as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In this non-randomized pilot study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of sequentially administered XELOX and XELIRI regimens or the reverse sequence in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Entry criteria were histologically confirmed mCRC, ECOG performance status (PS) <= 2 and adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function. All patients consecutively received XELOX followed by XELIRI at disease progression or vice versa. Results: In multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors with worse overall survival were: lower PS (p = 0.0001), multiple metastatic sites (p = 0.016) and high tumor grade. Higher serum levels of alkaline phosphatase and worse ECOG PS were associated with a shorter progression-free survival. Grade 3/4 mucositis, nausea/vomiting, grade 3/4 alopecia and grade 3 diarrhea were more frequent with XELIRI, whereas major toxicity events with XELOX were grade 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and grade 2/3 neurotoxicity. Conclusion: Capecitabine appears to be an acceptable alternative to continuous-infusion fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) in combination therapy and offers an effective, but more convenient alternative to continuous infusion FU/LV in the first-line treatment of patients with mCRC. Copyright (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectİç Hastalıkları
dc.subjectOnkoloji
dc.subjectONKOLOJİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.titleXELOX followed by XELIRI or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalONCOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentIstanbul Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar Training & Research Hospital , ,
dc.identifier.volume73
dc.identifier.startpage298
dc.identifier.endpage304
dc.contributor.firstauthorID181498


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster