Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKAYA, G
dc.contributor.authorBOZKURT, P
dc.contributor.authorYUCEL, A
dc.contributor.authorIPEK, Neval
dc.contributor.authorAltintas, Fatiş
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T08:42:21Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T08:42:21Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.citationAltintas F., BOZKURT P., IPEK N., YUCEL A., KAYA G., "The efficacy of pre- versus postsurgical axillary block on postoperative pain in paediatric patients", PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, cilt.10, sa.1, ss.23-28, 2000
dc.identifier.issn1155-5645
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_6497ca59-69ea-4fa4-acb2-bd46503742c4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/70002
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9592.2000.00426.x
dc.description.abstractWe compared the effects of pre- and postsurgical axillary block on pain after hand and forearm surgery in 55 children in a double-blind randomized study. The successful blocks are reported here (n = 49). Children aged 1-11 years and ASA I or II were allocated randomly to receive axillary block with 2 mg.kg(-1) of 0.25% bupivacaine, either after induction but before the surgery (presurgical group, n = 25) or immediately after surgery, before the end of anaesthesia (postsurgical, n = 24). In all patients, a standard general anaesthesia technique was used. The Faces Pain Scale (FPS) and analgesic requirements were recorded for 24 h at various times after operation. Eight patients (32%) in the presurgical group and 20 patients (83.33%) in the postsurgical soup did not require additional analgesic within the first 24 h after operation (P0.05). The FPS scores were similar in both groups during the first 8 h in the postoperative period (P>0.05). There was a significant difference at 10 h after surgery (P<0.05). Cumulative FPS score was higher in the presurgical soup (10.50 +/- 1.06) than in the postsurgical group (9.45 +/- 1.28) (P<0.05), but both groups had effective analgesia overall, the mean FPS score being less than 2. Additional analgesic consumption was similar in these patients in both groups. A lower isoflurane concentration was used in the presurgical group (0.68% vs 1.72%, P<0.001). We did not demonstrate the superiority of preemptive analgesia, but our results indicate that presurgical axillary block with 0.25% bupivacaine allows the use of inhalational anaesthetics at lower concentrations while providing a reasonably painless postoperative period.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectANESTEZİYOLOJİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectPEDİATRİ
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectÇocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectAnesteziyoloji
dc.titleThe efficacy of pre- versus postsurgical axillary block on postoperative pain in paediatric patients
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalPAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage23
dc.identifier.endpage28
dc.contributor.firstauthorID32066


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster