Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBİRİNCİ, TANSU
dc.contributor.authorKural, Cemal
dc.contributor.authorAltun, Suleyman
dc.contributor.authorOzdincler, Arzu Razak
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T20:38:25Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T20:38:25Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationBİRİNCİ T., Ozdincler A. R. , Altun S., Kural C., "A structured exercise programme combined with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching or static stretching in posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow: a randomized controlled trial", CLINICAL REHABILITATION, cilt.33, sa.2, ss.241-252, 2019
dc.identifier.issn0269-2155
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_5af71c65-9296-4cfc-bc63-e5274bf73022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/63885
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0269215518802886
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare the different stretching techniques, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching and static stretching, in patients with elbow stiffness after a treated elbow fracture. Design: Randomized-controlled, single-blind study. Setting: Department of physiotherapy and rehabilitation. Subjects: Forty patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness (24 women; mean age, 41.34 +/- 7.57 years). Intervention: PNF stretching group (n = 20), hold-relax PNF stretching combined with a structured exercise programme (two days per week for six weeks); static stretching group (n = 20), static stretching combined with a structured exercise programme (two days per week for six weeks). Main measures: The primary outcome is the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). The secondary outcomes are active range of motion (AROM), visual analogue scale (VAS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Short Form-12 and Global Rating of Change. Participants were assessed at baseline, after a six-week intervention period and one-month later (follow-up). Results: After treatment, improvement in the mean DASH score was slightly better in the PNF stretching group (8.66 +/- 6.15) compared with the static stretching group (19.25 +/- 10.30) (p = 0.03). The overall group-by-time interaction for the 2 x 3 mixed-model analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was also significant for elbow flexion AROM (mean change for PNF stretching group; static stretching group; 41.10, 34.42, p = 0.04), VAS-rest (-1.31, -1.08, p = 0.03) and VAS-activity (-3.78, -3.47, p = 0.01) in favour of PNF stretching group. The other outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the structured exercise programme combined with PNF stretching might be effective in patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness with regard to improving function, elbow flexion AROM, pain at rest and during activity.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectFiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectREHABİLİTASYON
dc.titleA structured exercise programme combined with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching or static stretching in posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow: a randomized controlled trial
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalCLINICAL REHABILITATION
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage241
dc.identifier.endpage252
dc.contributor.firstauthorID262183


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster