Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDonma, MM
dc.contributor.authorDonma, O
dc.contributor.authorSonmez, S
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T19:55:26Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T19:55:26Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationDonma M., Donma O., Sonmez S., "Prediction of birth weight by ultrasound in Turkish population. Which formula should be used in Turkey to estimate fetal weight?", ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, cilt.31, sa.12, ss.1577-1581, 2005
dc.identifier.issn0301-5629
dc.identifier.otherav_571e47d4-f9d0-4643-8690-1fe987eaec5f
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/61466
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.07.017
dc.description.abstractTo determine optimal sonographic fetal weight estimation formula for male and female infants, a prospective study has been performed. Uncomplicated pregnancies and 465 newborns were evaluated. Measurements included birth weight, length and head circumference in addition to fetal head circumference, femur length, abdominal circumference and biparietal diameter. Actual weights were compared with estimated weights calculated by ten different formula. Estimated fetal weight obtained from all formula, except those of Merz, Warsof and Ferrero, tended to be lower than the measured birth weight. The smallest mean differences were obtained with Hadlock 1, Hadlock 2, Hadlock 4 and Shepard formula (19 g-85 g), whereas Merz and Woo produced largest mean differences (110 g-364 g). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) generated with Hadlock 1 and Hadlock 2 formula were identical (0.90). ICCs obtained with Hadlock 3 and Hadlock 4, Shepard, Merz, Warsof and Campbell formula varied between 0.84 and 0.88. Hadlock 1 and 2 formula gave the closest approximation of birth weight in Turkish population. (c) 2005 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectNükleer Tıp
dc.subjectElektromanyetizma, Akustik, Isı Transferi, Klasik Mekanik ve Akışkanlar Dinamiği
dc.subjectAkustik
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectRADYOLOJİ, NÜKLEER TIP ve MEDİKAL GÖRÜNTÜLEME
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler (SCI)
dc.subjectFizik
dc.subjectAKUSTİK
dc.titlePrediction of birth weight by ultrasound in Turkish population. Which formula should be used in Turkey to estimate fetal weight?
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
dc.contributor.department, ,
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.identifier.issue12
dc.identifier.startpage1577
dc.identifier.endpage1581
dc.contributor.firstauthorID14359


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record