Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTasdemir, Haydar Ali
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Serap
dc.contributor.authorKanber, Yilmaz
dc.contributor.authorDilber, Cengiz
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T19:16:37Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T19:16:37Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationTasdemir H. A. , Dilber C., Kanber Y., Uysal S., "Intravenous immunoglobulin for Guillain-Barre syndrome: How effective?", JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, cilt.21, sa.11, ss.972-974, 2006
dc.identifier.issn0883-0738
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_53a77af4-70af-4ba8-afac-0fdca151db7d
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/59289
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/08830738060210110701
dc.description.abstractGuillain-Barre syndrome is an acute inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy characterized by progressive symmetric polyradiculoneuritis, predominantly manifested by weakness and areflexia. In this article, we report our findings in 25 children treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and compare them with the remaining 30 children who received supportive care only. Only supportive care was given to 30 children who were not able to receive intravenous gammaglobulin because of shortcomings in intravenous gammaglobulin availability owing to a poor import during those years. Twenty-five patients were treated with intravenous gammaglobulin; they received intravenous gammaglobulin 0.4 g/kg/day for 5 consecutive days. Seventeen of the intravenous gammaglobulin group had received intravenous gammaglobulin within 10 days after the first symptoms, and eight of them had received intravenous gammaglobulin after the first 10 days. The average time elapsed for the symptoms to reach the maximum level was 6.9 (range 4-12) days in patients receiving intravenous gammaglobulin in the first 10 days, and it was significantly shorter than the time elapsed for the supportive care group (6.9 versus 8.8 days, respectively) (P .05). Our suggestion for intravenous gammaglobulin treatment in Guillain-Barre syndrome is that if the patient has risk factors for respiratory insufficiency, then the treatment should be started. We more confidently carry out the follow-up of these patients after the results of this study. In conclusion, although it has been reported that intravenous gammaglobulin facilitates improvement in the disease and the decrease in mortality in children with Guillain-Barre syndrome, it has been mentioned in some studies that the intravenous gammaglobulin treatment was not better than supportive care, as in our study. However, further studies are essential to determine when intravenous gammaglobulin should be given to patients having which clinical and laboratory findings.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectPEDİATRİ
dc.subjectKLİNİK NEUROLOJİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectNöroloji
dc.subjectÇocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.titleIntravenous immunoglobulin for Guillain-Barre syndrome: How effective?
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY
dc.contributor.department, ,
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.startpage972
dc.identifier.endpage974
dc.contributor.firstauthorID180343


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record