Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDeger, Kemal
dc.contributor.authorSari, Sule Oztuk
dc.contributor.authorWormald, Peter John
dc.contributor.authorKara, Eyup
dc.contributor.authorBasaran, BORA
dc.contributor.authorÜNSALER, Selin
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T18:04:17Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T18:04:17Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationÜNSALER S., Basaran B., Sari S. O. , Kara E., Deger K., Wormald P. J. , "Safety and Efficacy of Chitosan-Dextran Hydrogel in the Middle Ear in an Animal Model", AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, cilt.21, sa.4, ss.254-260, 2016
dc.identifier.issn1420-3030
dc.identifier.otherav_4d05cc24-77aa-4ef3-8397-7b36c3504410
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/55126
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000447623
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To investigate the efficacy of chitosan-dextran hydrogel (CDH) in preventing postoperative adhesions between the tympanic membrane (TM) and intratympanic structures, and to evaluate its ototoxicity in an animal study. Methods: In the first step, ototoxicity was evaluated with 7 male albino guinea pigs (GPs) via auditory brainstem responses (ABR) before and 4 weeks after unilateral intratympanic injection of CDH and saline solution contralaterally. In the second step, 12 GPs underwent bilateral ear surgery. The middle ear (ME) mucosa was abraded, and the cavity was filled with CDH on one side and packed with Gelfoam on the contralateral side. A control group of 6 GPs underwent the same procedure except that no material was applied in the ME. The animals were euthanized at the end of the 7th week, and otomicroscopic findings were noted and the temporal bones harvested for the histologic examination. The findings were scored and compared. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the pre- and postoperative ABR thresholds. In the otomicroscopic findings, the most prominent difference between the two groups was the presence of retraction of the TM in the Gelfoam group. The histopathologic findings revealed a higher degree of inflammation in the Gelfoam group compared with the CDH group. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that CDH has no ototoxic effects in GPs. Its use as an ME packing material revealed significantly less TM retraction and inflammatory reaction compared with Gelfoam. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectKulak Burun Boğaz
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKULAK BURUN BOĞAZ
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri (LIFE)
dc.subjectSinirbilim ve Davranış
dc.subjectNEUROSCIENCES
dc.titleSafety and Efficacy of Chitosan-Dextran Hydrogel in the Middle Ear in an Animal Model
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalAUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentAgri Patnos State Hospital , ,
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage254
dc.identifier.endpage260
dc.contributor.firstauthorID102110


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster