Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Tayfun
dc.contributor.authorArisan, Volkan
dc.contributor.authorKarabuda, Zihni Cuneyt
dc.contributor.authorPiskin, Buelent
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T17:34:59Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T17:34:59Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationArisan V., Karabuda Z. C. , Piskin B., Ozdemir T., "Conventional Multi-Slice Computed Tomography (CT) and Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) for Computer-Aided Implant Placement. Part II: Reliability of Mucosa-Supported Stereolithographic Guides", CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, cilt.15, sa.6, ss.907-917, 2013
dc.identifier.issn1523-0899
dc.identifier.otherav_4a66ba6e-bfe0-45f4-8a36-c6ed42d43350
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/53455
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00435.x
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Deviations of implants that were placed by conventional computed tomography (CT)- or cone beam CT (CBCT)-derived mucosa-supported stereolithographic (SLA) surgical guides were analyzed in this study. Materials and Methods: Eleven patients were randomly scanned by a multi-slice CT (CT group) or a CBCT scanner (CBCT group). A total of 108 implants were planned on the software and placed using SLA guides. A new CT or CBCT scan was obtained and merged with the planning data to identify the deviations between the planned and placed implants. Results were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test and multiple regressions (p<.05). Results: Mean angular and linear deviations in the CT group were 3.30 degrees (SD 0.36), and 0.75 (SD 0.32) and 0.80mm (SD 0.35) at the implant shoulder and tip, respectively. In the CBCT group, mean angular and linear deviations were 3.47 degrees (SD 0.37), and 0.81 (SD 0.32) and 0.87mm (SD 0.32) at the implant shoulder and tip, respectively. No statistically significant differences were detected between the CT and CBCT groups (p=.169 and p=.551, p=.113 for angular and linear deviations, respectively). Conclusions: Implant placement via CT- or CBCT-derived mucosa-supported SLA guides yielded similar deviation values. Results should be confirmed on alternative CBCT scanners.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.titleConventional Multi-Slice Computed Tomography (CT) and Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) for Computer-Aided Implant Placement. Part II: Reliability of Mucosa-Supported Stereolithographic Guides
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalCLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH
dc.contributor.departmentGulhane Military Medical Academy , ,
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.startpage907
dc.identifier.endpage917
dc.contributor.firstauthorID55511


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record