Show simple item record

Haemodynamic Response to Four Different Laryngoscopes

dc.contributor.authorCamci, Emre
dc.contributor.authorAli, Achmet
dc.contributor.authorSeyhan, Tülay
dc.contributor.authorAltun, Demet
dc.contributor.authorOzonur, Anil
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T16:29:44Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T16:29:44Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationAltun D., Ali A., Camci E., Ozonur A., Seyhan T., "Haemodynamic Response to Four Different Laryngoscopes", TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, cilt.46, sa.6, ss.434-440, 2018
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_4486c026-6642-4eaf-ba86-c0c8a6af6417
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/49741
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/tjar.2018.59265
dc.description.abstractObjective: In this prospective randomized study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of tracheal intubation with four different laryngoscopes [Macintosh direct laryngoscope-classic laryngoscope (CL), McCoy (MC), C-Mac video-laryngoscope (CM) and McGrath video-laryngoscope (MG)] on haemodynamic responses in patients with a normal airway.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectAnesteziyoloji
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectANESTEZİYOLOJİ
dc.titleHaemodynamic Response to Four Different Laryngoscopes
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalTURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume46
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.startpage434
dc.identifier.endpage440
dc.contributor.firstauthorID97727


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record