Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIslak, Civan
dc.contributor.authorKocak, Burak
dc.contributor.authorZeynalova, Amalya
dc.contributor.authorKocer, Naci
dc.contributor.authorKizilkilic, Osman
dc.contributor.authorKorkmazer, Bora
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T15:54:00Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T15:54:00Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationKocak B., Kizilkilic O., Zeynalova A., Korkmazer B., Kocer N., Islak C., "Evaluation of sporadic intracranial cavernous malformations for detecting associated developmental venous anomalies: added diagnostic value of C-arm contrast-enhanced cone-beam CT to routine contrast-enhanced MRI", EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, cilt.29, sa.2, ss.783-791, 2019
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994
dc.identifier.otherav_415f3da9-9d8d-40a8-b089-6616093bec6a
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/47677
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5652-3
dc.description.abstractObjectiveOur purpose was to investigate the added diagnostic value of C-arm contrast-enhanced cone-beam CT (CE-CBCT) to routine contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) in detecting associated developmental venous anomalies (DVAs) in patients with sporadic intracranial cavernous malformations (ICMs).MethodsFifty-six patients (53 with single and three with double ICMs) met the inclusion criteria. All patients had routine CE-MRI scans performed at 1.5 Tesla. The imaging studies (CE-MRI and CE-CBCT) were retrospectively and independently reviewed by two observers, with consensus by a third. Group difference, intra- and interobserver agreement, and diagnostic performance of the modalities in detecting associated DVAs were calculated. Reference standard was CE-MRI.ResultsOn CE-MRI and CE-CBCT, 37 (66%; of 56) and 47 patients (84%; of 56) had associated DVAs, respectively. In 10 patients (52.6%; of CE-MRI negatives [n=19]), CE-CBCT improved the diagnosis. Nine patients (16%; of 56) had no DVA on both imaging techniques. Difference in proportions of associated DVAs on CE-MRI and CE-CBCT was statistically significant, p<0.05. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and area under the curve of CE-CBCT were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 90.5-100%), 47.3% (95% CI: 24.4-71.1%), 1.9 (95%CI: 1.240-2.911), 0.737 (95%CI: 0.602-0.845), respectively. Intraobserver agreement was excellent for CE-MRI, kappa () coefficient =0.960, and CE-CBCT, =0.931. Interobserver agreement was substantial for CE-MRI, =0.803, and excellent for CE-CBCT, =0.810.ConclusionsCE-CBCT is a useful imaging technique especially in patients with negative routine CE-MRI in terms of detecting associated DVAs. In nearly half of these particular patients, it reveals an associated DVA as a new diagnosis.Key Points center dot Although it is known to be the gold standard, some of the DVAs associated with ICMs are underdiagnosed with CE-MRI.center dot In nearly half of the patients with negative routine CE-MRI, CE-CBCT reveals an associated DVA as a new diagnosis.center dot Intra- and interobserver agreement on CE-CBCT is excellent in terms of detecting associated DVAs.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectNükleer Tıp
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectRADYOLOJİ, NÜKLEER TIP ve MEDİKAL GÖRÜNTÜLEME
dc.titleEvaluation of sporadic intracranial cavernous malformations for detecting associated developmental venous anomalies: added diagnostic value of C-arm contrast-enhanced cone-beam CT to routine contrast-enhanced MRI
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentCanakkale Mehmet Akif Ersoy State Hosp , ,
dc.identifier.volume29
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage783
dc.identifier.endpage791
dc.contributor.firstauthorID262152


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record