Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Gizem
dc.contributor.authorKaramehmetoglu, Safak Sahir
dc.contributor.authorSebik, Oguz
dc.contributor.authorKara, Sadik
dc.contributor.authorTurker, Kemal Sitki
dc.contributor.authorKaracan, Ilhan
dc.contributor.authorCidem, Muharrem
dc.contributor.authorCakar, Halil Ibrahim
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T15:00:58Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T15:00:58Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationCakar H. I. , Cidem M., Sebik O., Yilmaz G., Karamehmetoglu S. S. , Kara S., Karacan I., Turker K. S. , "Whole-body vibration-induced muscular reflex: Is it a stretch-induced reflex?", JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, cilt.27, sa.7, ss.2279-2284, 2015
dc.identifier.issn0915-5287
dc.identifier.otherav_3cb6e9c4-a3f3-43a5-b3ee-48e53c205ad5
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/44726
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2279
dc.description.abstract[Purpose] Whole-body vibration (WBV) can induce reflex responses in muscles. A number of studies have reported that the physiological mechanisms underlying this type of reflex activity can be explained by reference to a stretch-induced reflex. Thus, the primary objective of this study was to test whether the WBV-induced muscular reflex (WBV-IMR) can be explained as a stretch-induced reflex. [Subjects and Methods] The present study assessed 20 healthy males using surface electrodes placed on their right soleus muscle. The latency of the tendon reflex (T-reflex) as a stretch-induced reflex was compared with the reflex latency of the WBV-IMR. In addition, simulations were performed at 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 Hz to determine the stretch frequency of the muscle during WBV. [Results] WBV-IMR latency (40.5 +/- 0.8 ms; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.0-41.9 ms) was significantly longer than T-reflex latency (34.6 +/- 0.5 ms; 95% CI: 33.6-35.5 ms) and the mean difference was 6.2 ms (95% CI of the difference: 4.7-7.7 ms). The simulations performed in the present study demonstrated that the frequency of the stretch signal would be twice the frequency of the vibration. [Conclusion] These findings do not support the notion that WBV-IMR can be explained by reference to a stretch-induced reflex.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectFiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectREHABİLİTASYON
dc.titleWhole-body vibration-induced muscular reflex: Is it a stretch-induced reflex?
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume27
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.startpage2279
dc.identifier.endpage2284
dc.contributor.firstauthorID223273


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record