Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArslan, Omer Erkam
dc.contributor.authorDonmez, Muhammet İrfan
dc.contributor.authorHalat, Ahmed Omer
dc.contributor.authorSezgin, Tezcan
dc.contributor.authorGonen, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T12:43:29Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T12:43:29Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationGonen M., Arslan O. E. , Donmez M. İ. , Halat A. O. , Sezgin T., "Ureteral Catheter Versus Nephrostomy Tube for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospectively Randomized Trial", JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, cilt.33, sa.4, ss.291-294, 2019
dc.identifier.issn0892-7790
dc.identifier.otherav_2fb50c73-5665-4150-ad47-616b3e23de5c
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/36600
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0875
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate overnight ureteral catheterization vs nephrostomy tube for urinary diversion in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) under spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: Patients were enrolled using block randomization between February 2016 and July 2016. Patients with renal stones >2 cm confirmed via noncontrast-enhanced CT were included. All patients underwent PNL under spinal anesthesia. Group 1 refers to patients who had a nephrostomy tube following PNL, whereas group 2 refers to overnight ureteral catheterization. Those who refuse spinal anesthesia, 70 years of age, and anomalous kidneys (ectopic pelvic kidney, horseshoe kidney, etc.) were excluded. In group 1, nephrostomy tube (14F) was removed 48 hours after surgery, whereas the ureteral catheter (6F) was removed at postoperative 12th hour in group 2. Visual analogue scores (VASs) at 24th hour and mean narcotic analgesic (tramadol) amounts were compared. Results: There were 30 patients in both groups. Mean age, mean body mass index, and stone area were not significant between groups (p > 0.05, for all). With regard to operative measures, mean duration of surgery, mean number of accesses, and mean drop in Hb levels were comparable. Besides, mean hospitalization period in group 1 was 68.8 +/- 12 hours, whereas it was 54.5 +/- 10 hours in group 2 (p < 0.001). No patients in either group needed transfusion. Stone-free rates were similar in both groups (83% vs 90%, p = 0.391). Mean 24th hour VAS was 6.17 +/- 1.4 in group 1 and 3.37 +/- 1.4 in group 2 (p < 0.001). Also, there was a statistically significant difference in mean tramadol requirements between groups (181.67 +/- 56.45 vs 86.67 +/- 57.13, groups 1 and 2, respectively). Conclusion: In patients undergoing PNL under spinal anesthesia, using an open-ended ureteral catheter to be removed at early postoperative period reduces analgesic requirement and duration of hospital stay without compromising surgical outcomes and complication rates.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectİç Hastalıkları
dc.subjectNefroloji
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectÜROLOJİ VE NEFROLOJİ
dc.titleUreteral Catheter Versus Nephrostomy Tube for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospectively Randomized Trial
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentKonya Egitim Training & Research Hospital , ,
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage291
dc.identifier.endpage294
dc.contributor.firstauthorID729777


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record