Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAltiparmak, Mehmet Riza
dc.contributor.authorOzgun, Emre
dc.contributor.authorOruc, Meric
dc.contributor.authorSeyahi, Nurhan
dc.contributor.authorTrabulus, Sinan
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T11:27:36Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T11:27:36Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationTrabulus S., Oruc M., Ozgun E., Altiparmak M. R. , Seyahi N., "The Use of Low-Calcium Hemodialysis in the Treatment of Hypercalcemic Crisis", NEPHRON, cilt.139, sa.4, ss.319-331, 2018
dc.identifier.issn1660-8151
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_280aa7e9-5745-4b6f-af2e-f687b27537c6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/31785
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000488502
dc.description.abstractBackground: We reviewed the results of low-calcium hemodialysis (LCHD; 1.25 mmol/L) in the treatment of 42 cases admitting with hypercalcemic crisis. Methods: All patients (>= 18 years) who started LCHD due to hypercalcemia between 2002 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Biochemical data were obtained at the beginning of the first hemodialysis and at the end of the last hemodialysis. "Refractory" cases were defined as patients having albumin corrected serum total calcium (SCatotal) levels above 10.2 mg/dL despite of all medical, surgical, and hemodialysis treatments. Results: By acceptance of 3 cases admitted again over 6 months as new cases, a total of 42 cases (male, 57.1%) with a mean age of 55.9 +/- 14.8 years underwent urgent hemodialysis. Most of the patients (82.1%) had malignancies. The mean SCatotal level at the beginning of hemodialysis sessions was 15.89 +/- 2.53 mg/dL. The mean decline of SCatotal level was 4.63 +/- 2.72 mg/dL. Refractory cases received hemodialysis after admission significantly later than improved cases (48 [interquartile ranges (IQR) 24-168] vs. 24 [IQR 12-48] h, p = 0.010). Serum creatinine and SCatotal levels at the last visit were significantly more in refractory cases than improved cases (1.92 [IQR 0.81-3.41] vs. 1.30 [IQR 0.81.7] mg/dL, p = 0.031 and 12.43 +/- 2.53 vs. 8.86 +/- 0.67 mg/dL, p = 0.000 respectively). Mortality was significantly higher in refractory cases than improved cases (58.8 vs. 10.5%, p = 0.002). Overall mortality rate was 33.3%. Conclusion: Hypercalcemic crisis is a life-threatening condition and should be managed immediately. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectNefroloji
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectÜROLOJİ VE NEFROLOJİ
dc.subjectİç Hastalıkları
dc.titleThe Use of Low-Calcium Hemodialysis in the Treatment of Hypercalcemic Crisis
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalNEPHRON
dc.contributor.departmentKilis Publ Hosp , ,
dc.identifier.volume139
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage319
dc.identifier.endpage331
dc.contributor.firstauthorID249052


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record