dc.contributor.author | Öksüz, Lütfiye | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-02T16:21:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-02T16:21:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Öksüz L., " Anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens in a university hospital and resistance of anaerobic Gram negative rods to antibiotics", JOURNAL OF ISTANBUL FACULTY OF MEDICINE-ISTANBUL TIP FAKULTESI DERGISI, cilt.83, sa.4, ss.397-406, 2020 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1305-6441 | |
dc.identifier.other | vv_1032021 | |
dc.identifier.other | av_71611326-728d-4c3e-b485-7ef9ad141233 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/3026 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iuitfd | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.26650/iuitfd.2019.0074 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective:
Although anaerobic bacteria are
normal microbiota members in humans, they can cause endogenous and exogenous
infections. The empirical treatment of anaerobic infections is based on reports
of susceptibility patterns reported in various studies. This study aims to
identify the anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical samples in 2018 and to
determine the resistance of anaerobic Gram negative rods to antibiotics and to
compare the results obtained with the results of anaerobic Gram negative rods
isolated between 2015 and 2017 in the same unit in this study.Material
and method: Specimens were
inoculated on Schaedler Agar and Cooked Meat Broth and incubated in anaerobic
conditions. Bacteria were identified by colony morphologies, conventional tests
and anaerobic diagnostic discs. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed
using the concentration gradient method and evaluated according to the criteria
of CLSI.Results: Of the 1,630 clinical samples sent for anaerobic
culture, 41 (2.5%) anaerobic bacteria were isolated. Most of the bacteria were
isolated from the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics (29%), Otorhinolaryngology (29%)
clinics and mostly abscess specimens (49%). Seventy-one percent of the isolated
anaerobic bacteria were Gram negative and 29% Gram positive bacteria. The most
frequently isolated anaerobic bacteria were Bacteroides
fragilis group (24%) and Prevotella
spp (22%). Clindamycin resistance was quite high and there was no
carbapenem resistance in anaerobic Gram-negative rods, but one third of the
isolates were resistant to amoxicillin+clavulanic acid.
Conclusion: It was remarkable that more than half of the
isolated anaerobic Gram negative rods, especially the B. fragilis group, were resistant to clindamycin and about a third
of amoxicillin+ clavulanate. Increased resistance to these antibiotics used
empirically in the treatment of infections caused by anaerobic Gram-negative
rods is anticipated to limit antibiotic treatment regimens in the future.
Routine monitoring of resistance is necessary for proper empirical treatment. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.subject | Mikrobiyoloji ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji | |
dc.subject | Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji | |
dc.subject | TIP, GENEL & İÇECEK | |
dc.subject | Tıp | |
dc.subject | Sağlık Bilimleri | |
dc.subject | Temel Tıp Bilimleri | |
dc.subject | Mikrobiyoloji | |
dc.subject | Klinik Tıp | |
dc.subject | Yaşam Bilimleri (LIFE) | |
dc.subject | Klinik Tıp (MED) | |
dc.subject | MİKROBİYOLOJİ | |
dc.title | Anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens in a university hospital and resistance of anaerobic Gram negative rods to antibiotics | |
dc.type | Makale | |
dc.relation.journal | JOURNAL OF ISTANBUL FACULTY OF MEDICINE-ISTANBUL TIP FAKULTESI DERGISI | |
dc.contributor.department | İstanbul Üniversitesi , İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi , Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü | |
dc.identifier.volume | 83 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 397 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 406 | |
dc.contributor.firstauthorID | 2263668 | |