Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYarman, Ozan Uğraş
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T16:17:47Z
dc.date.available2021-03-02T16:17:47Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationYarman O. U. , "Search for an optimal tonal-system for an authentic Turkish soundscape", Near-Eastern Musicology Online (NEMO), cilt.5, sa.9, ss.73-111, 2020
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_36b9b1c7-0dc0-4e24-8ee7-b0da1f40770a
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/2826
dc.identifier.urihttp://nemo-online.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/(INTERNET)%20NEMO%20no.%205-9-1%20-%20Ozan%20Yarman%20(Search)%20201104S.pdf
dc.description.abstractThis study is the continuation of an older musicological work I had co-authored with Bozkurt et al. [2009, JNMR:38/1 pp.45-70], where I now analyze the match between several more alternative theoretical models and the histogram peaks of collated pitch measurements from audio recordings in 9 makam categories by prominent Turkish musicians. Previously, these histogram peaks were pitted against 53-tone Equal Temperament (53-tET), Yekta-Arel-Ezgi-Uzdilek (the 24-tone Pythagorean tuning in force), Yarman-24a (its notable substitute), Karadeniz-41 (a subset of 106-tET) and Yavuzoğlu-48 (in 48-tET). This time, new results indicate an outstanding marksmanship in the contrivance of 79 MOS 159-tET (my 79-tone Qanun tuning) above all others. A “Just Noticeable Difference” (JND) of solely 7-8 cents (¢) unweighted maximum divergence from the histogram peaks – in comparison to the as much as “half a comma” corresponding divergences of the contending 60-tET, 65-tET and 72-tET from the same peaks – enables 79 MOS 159-tET to outclass its competition. When size is an issue however, the “bulk vs. peak-matching performance” of the mentioned three immediate rivals to the 79-tone Qanun tuning are over the top and analogous to each other. All the same, the minimalist Yarman-24 a-b-c-d variants (as direct replacements for Arel-Ezgi-Uzdilek) do, despite being about thrice as sparse, deviate from the measured peak values by only “one comma” at most while performing reasonably. The key question therefore is: “Why triple the number of conventional tones just to gain half a comma finer granularity for makams that would still remain coarse?”. Likewise, one may ask: “Why double the number of tones whilst technically not managing to overcome the need for commatic alterations?” The findings are discussed in terms of which fixed-pitch approach is more optimal for traditional and modern practice in Turkish Classical/Art/Folk music.Keywords:Tuning, temperament, music theory, makam, maqam, pitch measurement, histogram peak, computational musicology
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectMüzik
dc.subjectMüzik Bilimleri
dc.subjectMuseology
dc.subjectMusic
dc.subjectVisual Arts and Performing Arts
dc.subjectSocial Sciences & Humanities
dc.subjectSosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectSanat
dc.subjectSANAT
dc.subjectMÜZİK
dc.subjectSanat ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler (SOC)
dc.subjectSanat ve Beşeri Bilimler (AHCI)
dc.titleSearch for an optimal tonal-system for an authentic Turkish soundscape
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalNear-Eastern Musicology Online (NEMO)
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , Devlet Konservatuvarı , Müzikoloji Bölümü
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.startpage73
dc.identifier.endpage111
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2511720


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster