Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYarman, Ozan Uğraş
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T16:17:47Z
dc.date.available2021-03-02T16:17:47Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationYarman O. U. , "Search for an optimal tonal-system for an authentic Turkish soundscape", Near-Eastern Musicology Online (NEMO), cilt.5, sa.9, ss.73-111, 2020
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_36b9b1c7-0dc0-4e24-8ee7-b0da1f40770a
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/2826
dc.identifier.urihttp://nemo-online.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/(INTERNET)%20NEMO%20no.%205-9-1%20-%20Ozan%20Yarman%20(Search)%20201104S.pdf
dc.description.abstractThis study is the continuation of an older musicological work I had co-authored with Bozkurt et al. [2009, JNMR:38/1 pp.45-70], where I now analyze the match between several more alternative theoretical models and the histogram peaks of collated pitch measurements from audio recordings in 9 makam categories by prominent Turkish musicians. Previously, these histogram peaks were pitted against 53-tone Equal Temperament (53-tET), Yekta-Arel-Ezgi-Uzdilek (the 24-tone Pythagorean tuning in force), Yarman-24a (its notable substitute), Karadeniz-41 (a subset of 106-tET) and Yavuzoğlu-48 (in 48-tET). This time, new results indicate an outstanding marksmanship in the contrivance of 79 MOS 159-tET (my 79-tone Qanun tuning) above all others. A “Just Noticeable Difference” (JND) of solely 7-8 cents (¢) unweighted maximum divergence from the histogram peaks – in comparison to the as much as “half a comma” corresponding divergences of the contending 60-tET, 65-tET and 72-tET from the same peaks – enables 79 MOS 159-tET to outclass its competition. When size is an issue however, the “bulk vs. peak-matching performance” of the mentioned three immediate rivals to the 79-tone Qanun tuning are over the top and analogous to each other. All the same, the minimalist Yarman-24 a-b-c-d variants (as direct replacements for Arel-Ezgi-Uzdilek) do, despite being about thrice as sparse, deviate from the measured peak values by only “one comma” at most while performing reasonably. The key question therefore is: “Why triple the number of conventional tones just to gain half a comma finer granularity for makams that would still remain coarse?”. Likewise, one may ask: “Why double the number of tones whilst technically not managing to overcome the need for commatic alterations?” The findings are discussed in terms of which fixed-pitch approach is more optimal for traditional and modern practice in Turkish Classical/Art/Folk music.Keywords:Tuning, temperament, music theory, makam, maqam, pitch measurement, histogram peak, computational musicology
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectMüzik
dc.subjectMüzik Bilimleri
dc.subjectMuseology
dc.subjectMusic
dc.subjectVisual Arts and Performing Arts
dc.subjectSocial Sciences & Humanities
dc.subjectSosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectSanat
dc.subjectSANAT
dc.subjectMÜZİK
dc.subjectSanat ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler (SOC)
dc.subjectSanat ve Beşeri Bilimler (AHCI)
dc.titleSearch for an optimal tonal-system for an authentic Turkish soundscape
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalNear-Eastern Musicology Online (NEMO)
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , Devlet Konservatuvarı , Müzikoloji Bölümü
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.startpage73
dc.identifier.endpage111
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2511720


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record