dc.contributor.author | Horasanli, Kaya | |
dc.contributor.author | Perk, Cem | |
dc.contributor.author | Gumus, Eyup | |
dc.contributor.author | Miroglu, Cengiz | |
dc.contributor.author | Yesildere, Tahsin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-03T09:05:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-03T09:05:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Horasanli K., Perk C., Yesildere T., Gumus E., Miroglu C., "Healing of the urethral plate after deep incision: Does catheterization change the course of this process?", UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, cilt.78, sa.3, ss.249-253, 2007 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0042-1138 | |
dc.identifier.other | av_1b22b263-1c4e-4576-8e45-df2675631eda | |
dc.identifier.other | vv_1032021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/23522 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1159/000099347 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: We aimed to evaluate the sequence of healing process as well as possible effects of stent placement on the healing process after deep urethral plate incision. Methods: A deep urethral plate incision was done at the 12 o'clock position. After that, in the first group (n = 14) the anterior urethra was stented with a silicon catheter. Animals in the second group (n = 14) underwent the same incision procedure, however no stent was placed after this operation. All animals in both groups were again divided into three groups with respect to the follow-up period (7 - 14 and 21 days). Partial penectomy was performed in all subgroups and histopathologic evaluation performed. Results: In the first group after 7 days, limited neovascularization and granulation tissue formation could be noted far away from the epithelial lumen. Evaluation of these specimens during the long-term follow- up ( 21 days) demonstrated an almost completely healed tissue with a remarkable neovascularization and well-developed granulation tissue. In the second group during 14 - 21 days, evaluation progression of tissue healing along with increasing vessel formation and re-epithelialization were demonstrated. Although the incision edges did show evident approximation, no sign of fibrosis could be demonstrated in these specimens. Conclusion: We may say that tissue healing with a desired and complete re-epithelialization could be achieved without inserting a catheter. Prevention of re-approximation along with the limited urinary extravasations to the subepithelial area might be responsible for tissue protection that will limit the long-term aforementioned adverse effects of the procedure. Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.subject | Nefroloji | |
dc.subject | Klinik Tıp (MED) | |
dc.subject | ÜROLOJİ VE NEFROLOJİ | |
dc.subject | Tıp | |
dc.subject | Sağlık Bilimleri | |
dc.subject | Dahili Tıp Bilimleri | |
dc.subject | İç Hastalıkları | |
dc.subject | Klinik Tıp | |
dc.title | Healing of the urethral plate after deep incision: Does catheterization change the course of this process? | |
dc.type | Makale | |
dc.relation.journal | UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS | |
dc.contributor.department | , , | |
dc.identifier.volume | 78 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 249 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 253 | |
dc.contributor.firstauthorID | 181061 | |