Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOztop, Nida
dc.contributor.authorGelincik, Asli
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Semra
dc.contributor.authorColakoglu, Bahauddin
dc.contributor.authorBuyukozturk, Suna
dc.contributor.authorBeyaz, Sengul
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-04T14:38:32Z
dc.date.available2022-07-04T14:38:32Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBeyaz S., Demir S., Oztop N., Colakoglu B., Buyukozturk S., Gelincik A., "How satisfactory is on-demand icatibant from the patients' perspective in real life?", ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, cilt.43, sa.2, ss.148-154, 2022
dc.identifier.issn1088-5412
dc.identifier.otherav_84c75dde-0930-49ff-bd94-9351eddd14a1
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/183551
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2022.43.210104
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patients' satisfaction is important for the success of the management of chronic diseases. Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the satisfaction level of the patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) for icatibant treatment. Methods: Patients with HAE C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) were evaluated by using a questionnaire that included details of their icatibant-treated attacks. Patients' demographic and clinical features were collected from their medical records and personal attack diaries. The visual analog scale was used for determining the attack severity. Results: Of the total 161 patients with HAE C1-INH, 91% had HAE type I and were included in the study. Patients reported a median (interquartile range [IQR]) attacks of 2 (0.5-3) per month and 16 (4.5-36) attacks per year. The median (IQR) frequency of attacks treated with icatibant was 6 (0-20) per year. The mean +/- standard deviation (SD) duration of treatment with icatibant was 3 +/- 2.3 years. The self-administration rate was 91.3%. The mean +/- SD time to administration and time to onset of symptom resolution were 1.6 +/- 1.1 hours and 1.7 +/- 1.3 hours, respectively. There was a correlation between the time to administration and time to onset of symptom resolution (r = 0.566; p < 0.0001). A total of 125 patients (77%) reported that they were very satisfied or satisfied with icatibant. No correlation was observed between the satisfaction level and the attack sites; however, the patients with more severe attacks were more satisfied with icatibant (p < 0.0001). A total of 52 patients reported 74 mild local reactions. Systemic reactions were not observed. Conclusion: The current real-life study showed that icatibant was safe and effective. Moreover, the patients' satisfaction level with icatibant was high. We believe that the availability of icatibant should be encouraged during HAE attacks because it enables patients to be more involved in their disease management.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectImmunology and Allergy
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectALERJİ
dc.titleHow satisfactory is on-demand icatibant from the patients' perspective in real life?
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume43
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage148
dc.identifier.endpage154
dc.contributor.firstauthorID3407128


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record