Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHEPOKUR, MUSTAFA
dc.contributor.authorKalciog, Mahmut Tayyar
dc.contributor.authorMUTLU, AHMET
dc.contributor.authorGunes, Medine
dc.contributor.authorOguz, Halit
dc.contributor.authorMUTLU, BAŞAK
dc.contributor.authorTORUN TOPÇU, MERVE
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-04T14:37:02Z
dc.date.available2022-07-04T14:37:02Z
dc.identifier.citationMUTLU B., TORUN TOPÇU M., MUTLU A., HEPOKUR M., Gunes M., Oguz H., Kalciog M. T. , "Vestibulo-ocular reflex evaluation of the children with acquired esotropia", INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, cilt.158, 2022
dc.identifier.issn0165-5876
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_82c0eb06-0833-4882-82c0-f905ee99aaf7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/183525
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111170
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aims to evaluate the effects of acquired esotropia on vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain in children using video (vHIT) and functional head impulse (fHIT) tests. Methods: A total of 62 children aged 6-18 years, with acquired esotropia and normal vision, were evaluated in the study. The patients were divided into two sub-groups: accommodative and non-accommodative. VOR gains were analyzed by performing lateral canal vHIT and fHIT with monocular and binocular recordings by a single examiner. Results: Seventeen (10 male, 7 female) children with accommodative esotropia, 24 (14 male, 10 female) children with non-accommodative esotropia, and 21 (8 male and 12 female) healthy controls were included in this study. The vHIT findings did not differ between the groups (p>.05). In the non-accommodative esotropia group, the location of the camera in both binocular and monocular vHIT recordings made a significant difference in the left VOR gain (p = .025, z = -2.243, p = .032, and z = -2.143, respectively), but no difference was observed in the right VOR gain. In the accommodative esotropia group, while the camera was on the left there was a significant difference in the right VOR gain between binocular and monocular recordings (p = .016, z = -2.413) but no difference was observed in the left VOR gain. No overt or covert saccade was detected in any group. Conclusions: The statistical differences found in vHIT and fHIT in acquired esotropia patients are thought to be sporadic and based on the results of this study no correction or change in recording technique is required for vHIT or fHIT in children with acquired esotropia.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectÇocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectKulak Burun Boğaz
dc.subjectPediatrics
dc.subjectOtorhinolaryngology
dc.subjectSpeech and Hearing
dc.subjectPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectPEDİATRİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKULAK BURUN BOĞAZ
dc.titleVestibulo-ocular reflex evaluation of the children with acquired esotropia
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume158
dc.contributor.firstauthorID3431469


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record