Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYENER, HAYDAR MURAT
dc.contributor.authorAtas, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorDeniz, Risvan
dc.contributor.authorKARA, EYYUP
dc.contributor.authorDENİZ, BURCU
dc.contributor.authorKara, Halide Cetin
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-04T14:03:16Z
dc.date.available2022-07-04T14:03:16Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationDeniz R., KARA E., DENİZ B., Kara H. C. , YENER H. M. , Atas A., "Electrically Evoked Auditory Late Responses as a Novel Method for Cochlear Implant Programming", OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, cilt.43, sa.4, 2022
dc.identifier.issn1531-7129
dc.identifier.otherav_65eb0c12-719b-490e-9ccf-2071f165c59b
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/183074
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000003485
dc.description.abstractHypothesis: Electrically evoked auditory late responses (eALR) are useful as an objective cochlear implant (CI) fitting method. Background: Different objective and behavioral methods are used for CI fitting. However, there is no objective method that indicates that the electrical signal reaches the auditory cortex. eALR is an indicator that electrical signals reach the auditory cortex, so our aim was to investigate the use of eALR as an objective method for CI programming. Methods: Two different programs were created for 21 unilateral Med-El CI users. In the first program, the most comfortable level (MCL) was adjusted with the electrical stapes reflex threshold (eSRT), and the threshold levels (THR) were behaviorally adjusted according to the user's feedback. In the second program, the MCL level was adjusted to a level where all the components of the eALR were clearly seen, and the user did not feel uncomfortable; the THR levels were adjusted to the lowest level where the eALR P1 wave could be seen. The results of the MCL and THR levels of the two programs and the free field tests conducted with both programs were compared. Results: While MCL levels did not differ significantly between the two programs, a significant difference was observed between THR levels. In addition, no significant difference was found between hearing and speech tests with CI in the free field. Conclusion: The results revealed no significant performance difference between the two programs and that eALR could be preferred as an objective method for MCL determination.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectKLİNİK NEUROLOJİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKULAK BURUN BOĞAZ
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectNöroloji
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectKulak Burun Boğaz
dc.subjectNeurology
dc.subjectNeurology (clinical)
dc.subjectOtorhinolaryngology
dc.subjectSpeech and Hearing
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.titleElectrically Evoked Auditory Late Responses as a Novel Method for Cochlear Implant Programming
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalOTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa , ,
dc.identifier.volume43
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.contributor.firstauthorID3415586


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster