Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAarsland, Dag
dc.contributor.authorEmre, Murat
dc.contributor.authorDe Deyn, Peter Paul
dc.contributor.authorHsu, Chuanchieh
dc.contributor.authorLane, Roger
dc.contributor.authorBurn, David
dc.contributor.authorMcKeith, Ian
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T07:36:44Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T07:36:44Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationBurn D., Emre M., McKeith I., De Deyn P. P. , Aarsland D., Hsu C., Lane R., "Effects of rivastigmine in patients with and without visual hallucinations in dementia associated with Parkinson's disease", MOVEMENT DISORDERS, cilt.21, sa.11, ss.1899-1907, 2006
dc.identifier.issn0885-3185
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_12e79e7c-607e-4195-bf3b-9a5d009f6f5b
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/18156
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/mds.21077
dc.description.abstractWe aimed to determine prospectively whether rivastigmine, an inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase and butyryleholinesterase, provided benefits in patients with and without visual hallucinations in a population with dementia associated with Parkinson's disease (PDD). This was a 24-week double-blind placebo-controlled study. Primary efficacy measures were the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinician's Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC). Secondary efficacy measures included activities of daily living, behavioral symptoms, and executive and attentional functions. Patients were stratified according to the presence of visual hallucinations at baseline. The study included 188 visual hallucinators (118 on rivastigmine, 70 on placebo) and 348 nonvisual hallucinators (239 on rivastigmine, 109 on placebo). Rivastigmine provided benefits in both visual hallucinators and nonvisual hallucinators. Absolute responses to rivastigmine on the ADAS-cog were comparable over 6 months, although rivastigmine-placebo differences tended to be larger in visual hallucinators (4.27; P = 0.002) than in nonhallucinators (2.09; P = 0.015). On the ADCS-CGIC, differences between rivastigmine and placebo were 0.5 in visual hallucinators (P = 0.030) and 0.3 in nonhallucinators (P = 0.111). Rivastigmine provided benefits on all secondary efficacy measures, and placebo declines and treatment differences were more marked in visual hallucinators. Adverse events were reported more frequently by rivastigmine-treated patients, although this difference was less marked in visual hallucinators. Visual hallucinations appear to predict more rapid decline and possibly greater therapeutic benefit from rivastigmine treatment in PDD.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectNöroloji
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKLİNİK NEUROLOJİ
dc.titleEffects of rivastigmine in patients with and without visual hallucinations in dementia associated with Parkinson's disease
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalMOVEMENT DISORDERS
dc.contributor.department, ,
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.startpage1899
dc.identifier.endpage1907
dc.contributor.firstauthorID180350


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record