dc.contributor.author | Gumusbas, Ali Haydar | |
dc.contributor.author | Bakire, Tulay | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-04T11:55:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-04T11:55:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Gumusbas A. H. , Bakire T., "Bioequivalence Study of Two Different Formulations of Ceftiofur Following Intramuscular Administration in Cattle", ACTA VETERINARIA EURASIA, cilt.48, sa.1, ss.22-29, 2022 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2618-639X | |
dc.identifier.other | av_04fcc9fe-d6ca-4443-9f8d-2a2daa0bcfeb | |
dc.identifier.other | vv_1032021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/181438 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5152/actavet.2021.21064 | |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of the present study was to explore the bioequivalence of ceftiofur hydrochloride sterile suspension (5%) in two formulations, a reference formulation (Excenel' Ready To Use (RTU) 5% Ceftiofur (CEF) (Pfizer, New Jersey, USA)) and a test formulation (ceftipure 5% (Alke, Istanbul, Turkey)). Both products were administered to each of 10 healthy Holstein cattle (1.1 mg/kg body weight, intramuscularly) during a two-period crossover parallel experimental design. Blood samples were collected before and at 0.16, 0.33, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after a single intramuscular administration. The plasma concentrations of ceftiofur and desfuroylceftiofur-related metabolites were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The descriptive pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated and compared by variance analysis, with 90% confidence intervals. The comparison values between reference and test formulation for maximum plasma concentration, time to maximum concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve to last concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity were 0.59 +/- 0.15 mu g/mL, 053 +/- 0.20 mu g/mL, 2.10 +/- 0.30 hours, 2.00 +/- 0.00 hours, 2.94 +/- 0.13 mu g h/mL, 2.84 +/- 0.25 mu g h/mL, and 3.16 +/- 0.19 mu g h/mL, 3.10 +/- 0.14 mu g h/mL, respectively. In addition, 90% Cls of these ratios for reference and test product were within acceptable ranges, and the relative bioavailability (F) of test products was 96.57% according to area under the plasma concentration-time curve to last concentration. The results demonstrated that ceftipure 5% is bioequivalent to Excenel (R) RTU 5% CEF in cattle. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.subject | Equine | |
dc.subject | Small Animals | |
dc.subject | Health Sciences | |
dc.subject | Tarımsal Bilimler | |
dc.subject | General Veterinary | |
dc.subject | Veterinary (miscellaneous) | |
dc.subject | Veteriner Bilimleri | |
dc.subject | Sağlık Bilimleri | |
dc.subject | Tarım ve Çevre Bilimleri (AGE) | |
dc.subject | Bitki ve Hayvan Bilimleri | |
dc.subject | VETERİNERLİK BİLİMLERİ | |
dc.title | Bioequivalence Study of Two Different Formulations of Ceftiofur Following Intramuscular Administration in Cattle | |
dc.type | Makale | |
dc.relation.journal | ACTA VETERINARIA EURASIA | |
dc.contributor.department | İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa , , | |
dc.identifier.volume | 48 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 22 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 29 | |
dc.contributor.firstauthorID | 3393409 | |