Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeal, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorTana, Maria Gabriella
dc.contributor.authorBianchi, Anna Maria
dc.contributor.authorSclocco, Roberta
dc.contributor.authorFranchin, Tiziana
dc.contributor.authorCerutti, Sergio
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-18T10:48:44Z
dc.date.available2022-02-18T10:48:44Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationTana M. G. , Bianchi A. M. , Sclocco R., Franchin T., Cerutti S., Leal A., "Parcel-Based Connectivity Analysis of fMRI Data for the Study of Epileptic Seizure Propagation", BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, cilt.25, sa.4, ss.345-361, 2012
dc.identifier.issn0896-0267
dc.identifier.otherav_bdbabb17-495c-4cdc-9283-289311f3a617
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/179942
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-012-0225-2
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this work is to improve fMRI Granger Causality Analysis (GCA) by proposing and comparing two strategies for defining the topology of the networks among which cerebral connectivity is measured and to apply fMRI GCA for studying epileptic seizure propagation. The first proposed method is based on information derived from anatomical atlas only; the other one is based on functional information and employs an algorithm of hierarchical clustering applied to fMRI data directly. Both methods were applied to signals recorded during seizures on a group of epileptic subjects and two connectivity matrices were obtained for each patient. The performances of the different parcellation strategies were evaluated in terms of their capability to recover information about the source and the sink of the network (i.e., the starting and the ending point of the seizure propagation). The first method allows to clearly identify the seizure onset in all patients, whereas the network sources are not so immediately recognizable when the second method was used. Nevertheless, results obtained using functional clustering do not contradict those obtained with the anatomical atlas and are able to individuate the main pattern of propagation. In conclusion, the way nodes are defined can influence the easiness of identification of the epileptogenic focus but does not produce contradictory results showing the effectiveness of proposed approach to formulate hypothesis about seizure propagation at least in the early phase of investigation.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectSensory Systems
dc.subjectHuman-Computer Interaction
dc.subjectNeurology (clinical)
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectPhysical Sciences
dc.subjectKLİNİK NEUROLOJİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectNEUROSCIENCES
dc.subjectSinirbilim ve Davranış
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri (LIFE)
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectNöroloji
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.subjectNeurology
dc.subjectDevelopmental Neuroscience
dc.subjectCellular and Molecular Neuroscience
dc.subjectCognitive Neuroscience
dc.subjectGeneral Neuroscience
dc.subjectNeuroscience (miscellaneous)
dc.titleParcel-Based Connectivity Analysis of fMRI Data for the Study of Epileptic Seizure Propagation
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalBRAIN TOPOGRAPHY
dc.contributor.departmentPolytechnic University of Milan , ,
dc.identifier.volume25
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage345
dc.identifier.endpage361
dc.contributor.firstauthorID3380420


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record