Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorZamur Tuncer, Rabia
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-18T10:27:08Z
dc.date.available2022-02-18T10:27:08Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationZamur Tuncer R., " The Relationship Between Place And “Remembering And Forgetting” And The Construction Of Antagonistic Memory In The Context Of Social Memory", Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, sa.11, ss.10-34, 2022
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_9cf143e6-e591-4f7f-835e-f45c63033726
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/179258
dc.description.abstractIt is clear that throughout the history of mankind, power struggles have been waged and consolidated over the domination of land and/or space. However, in the context of technological determinism, it can be said that the power struggle for the seizure of space has evolved in parallel with the transformation of processes and determinants. This is because, again, actual domination over (and/or occupation of) a physical space has given way to symbolic occupations of spaces and to the tradition of waging battles for might and power in a more abstract fashion. The principal element of abstract occupation and domination struggles is memory. “Memory,” which is defined as the ability to consciously keep in mind the subjects experienced or learned and their historical context, is indisputably the power that determines what we do and say and that determines and dominates the processes of remembering and forgetting, as long as no opposition exists or is created that could cause hesitation in strict acceptance. There is bound to be a relationship between space and memory for the reason mentioned above. This study aimed to examine the antagonistic construction of social memory in light of basic theories. To this end, focus was placed first on memory and social memory, and the related concepts were defined. Then, the nature of memory specific to the practices of remembering and forgetting was examined under the guidance of approaches to protagonist and antagonist memory, and an attempt was made to present the subject’s relationship with space from different perspectives. As a result, this study revealed that memory can never be considered as an individual forgetting/preservation device, and that its antagonistic dimension stems from the “uncompromising conflict of remembering and forgetting that it contains.” Keywords: Memory; Space; Social Memory; Antagonist Memory; Remembering-Forgetting,
dc.language.isotur
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler (SOC)
dc.subjectSosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.titleThe Relationship Between Place And “Remembering And Forgetting” And The Construction Of Antagonistic Memory In The Context Of Social Memory
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalAkdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , İletişim Fakültesi , Gazetecilik Bölümü
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.startpage10
dc.identifier.endpage34
dc.contributor.firstauthorID3388829


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster