Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorEfes, Begum Gusray
dc.contributor.authorGÖMEÇ, Ömer Yavuz
dc.contributor.authorDÖRTER, Can
dc.contributor.authorErdilek, Dina
dc.contributor.authorYAMAN, BATU CAN
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-18T10:12:33Z
dc.date.available2022-02-18T10:12:33Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationYAMAN B. C. , Efes B. G. , DÖRTER C., Erdilek D., GÖMEÇ Ö. Y. , "MICROHARDNESS OF THE APPROXIMAL AND PULPAL SURFACES IN CLASS II COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS: AN IN VITRO STUDY", JOURNAL OF ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF DENTISTRY, cilt.42, sa.3-4, ss.41-47, 2008
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_8600e76e-52d3-42b4-8e41-ef4a50d8603c
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/178792
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this in vitro study was to examine the surface microhardness of composite resin materials when placed in class II cavities using two different matrix systems (Quickmat, Polydentia and Lucifix, HaweNeos). A hybrid composite (Tetric EvoCeram-Ivoclar Vivadent), two nanohybrid composites (Grandio-Voco, Synergy D6-Coltene/Whaledent) and a nanofil composite (Filtek Supreme XT-3M Espe) were placed in the silicon dublicates of class II cavities which were primarly prepared in plastic teeth without levels (4x4x4) mm (n=160). The cavity was prepared in plastic teeth (4mm bucco-lingual x 4 mm depth x 3mm mesio-distal) (KaVo, EWL model). Cavosurface margins were not beveled. The impressions of the tooth with the cavity preparation were taken using polyvinyl siloxan(Speedy/PuttyLigth-Coltene). A silicon material (AffinisPrecious-Coltene) was injected in the impressions and a silicon mold of the teeth and the cavity were obtained. The prepared silicon teeth were mounted in plastic jaw (KaVo, EWL model) to simulate proximal contact. Metal sectional matrix (Quickmat-Polydentia) (n=20) and clear matrix system (Lucifix-HaweNeos) (n=20) were prepared for each tooth. Wedges were used to stabilize the matrix. The cavities were restored incrementally in oblique layers with all four restorative materials. And each increment was light cured for 40 s (Celalux-Voco). The restorations were then removed from the cavities and surface hardness of the proximal and axio-pulpal surfaces were immediatly measured with Microhardness Vickers Test device (Clemex CMT 7, Clemex Labs.). Data were statistically analyzed with one way ANOVA and Tukey's Multiple Comprassion test. No significant differences were found between metal matrix and clear matrix (p>0.05). Microhardness of axio-pulpal surfaces were found significantly lower than the proximal surfaces for each restorative materials (p<0.05). Metal or clear matrix systems both could be used in the class II cavities in regard the surface microhardness of composite resins materials.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectOrthodontics
dc.subjectOral Surgery
dc.subjectDentistry (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectDental Hygiene
dc.subjectPeriodontics
dc.subjectDental Assisting
dc.subjectGeneral Dentistry
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.titleMICROHARDNESS OF THE APPROXIMAL AND PULPAL SURFACES IN CLASS II COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS: AN IN VITRO STUDY
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF DENTISTRY
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi , Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi , Klinik Bilimler Bölümü
dc.identifier.volume42
dc.identifier.issue3-4
dc.identifier.startpage41
dc.identifier.endpage47
dc.contributor.firstauthorID3375455


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster