Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTaskin, Ali Cihan
dc.contributor.authorBagis, Haydar
dc.contributor.authorCaputcu, Arzu Tas
dc.contributor.authorArat, Sezen
dc.contributor.authorAkkoc, Tolga
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T12:24:50Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T12:24:50Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationAkkoc T., Taskin A. C. , Caputcu A. T. , Arat S., Bagis H., "The Effect of Solid Surface Vitrification (SSV) Versus Classic Vitrification Technique on Survive Rate of in vitro Produced Bovine Blastocysts", JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCES, cilt.10, sa.22, ss.2885-2891, 2011
dc.identifier.issn1680-5593
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_bb3f67a3-f3d3-410e-b468-ddc43fcac646
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/173836
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2011.2885.2891
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare Solid Surface Vitrification (SSV) technique and classic vitrification technique in in vitro produced 8 days old bovine blastocysts. Cryopreservation of mammalian embryo has great importance for genetic resources conservation, embryo transfer, veterinary and clinical reproductive biotechnology and animal assisted reproductive technologies. Immature oocytes were maturated then fertilized with frozen-thawed bull semen and cultured until blastocyst stage in commercial sequential culture medium for 8 days. Blastocysts were vitrified in two different groups as SSV and classic vitrification and non-vitrified blastocysts were used as control group. After vitrification, vitrified blastocysts were warmed and cultured for 1 day. For this aim, blastocyst viability rate and median cell number were investigated. The blastocyst viability rate that vitrified by classic vitrification (34.8%) were found to be lower than those vitrified by SSV (82.6%1 and control group blastocysts (100%). However, median cell numbers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts were found higher in SSV (124) than classic vitrification (104). Median cell number of control group was detected as 213. As a result blastocyst viability rate and median cell number in SSV group was higher than classic vitrification group, there was a significant difference between SSV and classic vitrification group (p<0.05).
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectEquine
dc.subjectSmall Animals
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectTarımsal Bilimler
dc.subjectGeneral Veterinary
dc.subjectVeterinary (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectVeteriner Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTarım ve Çevre Bilimleri (AGE)
dc.subjectBitki ve Hayvan Bilimleri
dc.subjectVETERİNERLİK BİLİMLERİ
dc.titleThe Effect of Solid Surface Vitrification (SSV) Versus Classic Vitrification Technique on Survive Rate of in vitro Produced Bovine Blastocysts
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCES
dc.contributor.departmentGebze Teknik Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.identifier.issue22
dc.identifier.startpage2885
dc.identifier.endpage2891
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2742475


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record