Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSebnem, Batur
dc.contributor.authorSalih, Pekmezci
dc.contributor.authorEmre, Tunc
dc.contributor.authorYasemin, Pekmezci
dc.contributor.authorOsman, Simsek
dc.contributor.authorMehmet, Velidedeoglu
dc.contributor.authorSefa, Ergun
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T11:33:32Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T11:33:32Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationSefa E., Emre T., Sebnem B., Yasemin P., Mehmet V., Osman S., Salih P., "Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: A Good Prognostic Tumor of the Bad Lucky Organ", JOURNAL OF THE PANCREAS, cilt.22, sa.4, ss.93-98, 2021
dc.identifier.otherav_85d48447-e5d4-4cca-856d-10e5e9d9088f
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/172143
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas is a rare clinical entity with low malignant potential and good clinical prognosis. It was first defined by Frantz Virginia in 1959 and was renamed solid pseudopapillary tumor by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2010. SPN is more common in young women with an average age of 28-32 years and a female: male ratio of 3-10:1 in different publications. Material & Method The data were retrospectively analyzed for 26 patients whose pathology was compatible with SPN and operated on between 2003 and 2019 in the General Surgery Clinic at XXX. Results Of the patients, 25 (96.2%) were female and 1 (3.8%) was male; the mean age at diagnosis was 37.1 (range: 18-69, eight patients <30 years); mean body mass index was 28.8 kg/m(2). The most common reason for referral was abdominal pain (n=13, 50%); three patients (11%) had nausea and vomiting, and one patient (3.8%) had jaundice with mass at the head of the pancreas. Ten patients (38%) were asymptomatic and were diagnosed incidentally during examinations performed for other reasons. The most frequent tumor localization was the head and neck part of the pancreas (n=10, 38%); eight patients (31%) had body, and eight patients (31%) had tail localization. Ten patients (38%) had Whipple procedure (pancreaticoduodenectomy), 15 patients (53%) had distal pancreatectomy, and one patient had intra-abdominal mass excision and segmental small bowel resection operation in addition to distal pancreatectomy. Six (37%) of the 16 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy had splenectomy too. One of the patients had laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. The mean tumor diameter was 7.2 cm (range: 2-23 cm). Conclusion SPN is a rare tumor, and even though it is diagnosed late and in large sizes, it has prolonged survival when appropriate surgical resection is applied. The ability to perform surgery even in cases with relapse or meta stasis during the SPN follow-up reveals the importance of accurate diagnosis.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectİç Hastalıkları
dc.subjectGastroenteroloji-(Hepatoloji)
dc.subjectGastroenterology
dc.subjectHepatology
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectGASTROENTEROLOJİ VE HEPATOLOJİ
dc.titleSolid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: A Good Prognostic Tumor of the Bad Lucky Organ
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF THE PANCREAS
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume22
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage93
dc.identifier.endpage98
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2694366


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster