Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKOYUTÜRK, Meral
dc.contributor.authorIsildar, Basak
dc.contributor.authorOzkan, Serbay
dc.contributor.authorOncul, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorBaslar, Zafer
dc.contributor.authorKaleli, Semih
dc.contributor.authorTasyurekli, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-06T21:41:30Z
dc.date.available2021-03-06T21:41:30Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationIsildar B., Ozkan S., Oncul M., Baslar Z., Kaleli S., Tasyurekli M., KOYUTÜRK M., "Comparison of different cryopreservation protocols for human umbilical cord tissue as source of mesenchymal stem cells", ACTA HISTOCHEMICA, cilt.121, ss.361-367, 2019
dc.identifier.issn0065-1281
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_ffd5afee-16d2-4731-9a4e-1be448159f07
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/167237
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.acthis.2019.02.008
dc.description.abstractThe main purpose of this study is to establish an effective cryopreservation protocol for the umbilical cord tissue as a source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). In this context, it was aimed to use a cryoprotectant that could be an alternative to dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) which is commonly used despite the toxic side effects. Therefore, two different cryopreservation solutions were prepared using 10% DMSO and 10% 1,2 propanediol (PrOH). The fresh tissue group that was not performed cryopreservation was used as the control group. Following the cryopreservation step, MSCs were isolated from all groups and compared with each other to assess the efficiency of the cryopreservation solutions. The comparison was performed in terms of followings: morphology, immunophenotypes, growth kinetics, differentiation, and ultrastructural features. Based on the results, there were no significant morphological and immunophenotypic differences between the MSCs isolated from cryopreserved tissue groups and the MSCs isolated from the fresh tissue group. According to the growth kinetic analysis, the cells isolated from the PrOH group had a lower proliferation rate than the cells isolated from the fresh tissue. However, there was no significant difference between the cryopreserved groups in this respect. Osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation was observed in all groups. Upon comparison of the cryopreserved groups, PrOH group was discovered to hold a minor superiority in terms of these modes of differentiation. These results suggest that PrOH, which is considered as a cryoprotectant with low toxicity, could be used as a preferred cryoprotectant instead of DMSO concerning the process of cryopreservation of the umbilical cord.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectMolecular Biology
dc.subjectHistoloji-Embriyoloji
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri
dc.subjectMoleküler Biyoloji ve Genetik
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.subjectCell Biology
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectHÜCRE BİYOLOJİSİ
dc.subjectMoleküler Biyoloji ve Genetik
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri (LIFE)
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Tıp Bilimleri
dc.titleComparison of different cryopreservation protocols for human umbilical cord tissue as source of mesenchymal stem cells
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalACTA HISTOCHEMICA
dc.contributor.departmentIstanbul University - Cerrahpasa , ,
dc.identifier.volume121
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage361
dc.identifier.endpage367
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2504111


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster