Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSengul, Ozlem Kalaycik
dc.contributor.authorBuyukkayhan, Derya
dc.contributor.authorOzumut, Sibel Sevuk
dc.contributor.authorKiral, Asuman
dc.contributor.authorAkin, Ilke Mungan
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-06T21:29:26Z
dc.date.available2021-03-06T21:29:26Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationAkin I. M. , Sengul O. K. , Ozumut S. S. , Kiral A., Buyukkayhan D., "Neonatal Brucellosis: Two Cases with Two Different Transmissions", GUNCEL PEDIATRI-JOURNAL OF CURRENT PEDIATRICS, cilt.13, ss.134-137, 2015
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_fee717e2-9c51-48e8-8d2a-1930fde20a45
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/166671
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/jcp.29494
dc.description.abstractBrucellosis remains as an endemic infection of humans in many parts of the world; Latin America, Asia including Middle East and Mediterranean region including Turkey. Neonatal brucellosis is very rare and clinical manifestations as well as transmission route are not well-defined. The neonate can be either infected transplacentally, or by ingestion of mother's secretions and blood during delivery, or by ingestion of breast milk. Here, we present two cases with two different transmission route and clinical findings. First case is a premature infant born after 31 weeks of gestation and hospitalized for respiratory distress in addition to hepatosplenomegaly and leukocytosis. Brucella species were isolated from the initial blood culture obtained just after birth. Clinical and laboratory findings improved with decreased ventilatory support after replacement of antibiotherapy with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and rifampicin. Second case was a 28 days old, term infant. Her sibling was diagnosed as brucellosis and during evaluation of the family members, her mother was found to have brucellosis just before delivery. Initial evaluation of the baby after birth was totally normal. Beside medical advice, she was breastfed and in the 4th week of life she was found to have leucopenia and neutropenia, and brucella tube agglutination test turned to be positive. After antibiotherapy, laboratory findings were normalized. Breastfeeding was ceased during the treatment periods of both mothers. Both families were from rural regions of Turkey, who were using unpasteurized dairy products. Both patients were treated with TMP-SMX and rifampicin for 6 weeks without any complication. Brucella spp must be sought as a causative agent in the differential diagnosis of intrauterine and neonatal infections in endemic countries. Family members of patients from rural areas of the country must be questioned about traditional food consumption, as findings of neonatal brucellosis are various and vague.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectÇocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectPEDİATRİ
dc.titleNeonatal Brucellosis: Two Cases with Two Different Transmissions
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalGUNCEL PEDIATRI-JOURNAL OF CURRENT PEDIATRICS
dc.contributor.departmentIstanbul Goztepe Training and Research Hospital , ,
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage134
dc.identifier.endpage137
dc.contributor.firstauthorID223649


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster