Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKandemir, Omer
dc.contributor.authorSalihoglu, Kerime Nazli
dc.contributor.authorKuzu, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorYerebasmaz, Neslihan
dc.contributor.authorYalvac, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorEsinler, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorAldemir, Oya Bircan
dc.contributor.authorDavutoglu, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorKarahanoglu, Ertugrul
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-06T20:38:49Z
dc.date.available2021-03-06T20:38:49Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationEsinler D., Aldemir O. B. , Davutoglu E., Karahanoglu E., Salihoglu K. N. , Kuzu E., Yerebasmaz N., Kandemir O., Yalvac S., "A new mathematical formula to predict the foetal weight in twin pregnancies: A comparison of it with 19 different formulas", JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, cilt.37, ss.53-57, 2017
dc.identifier.issn0144-3615
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_fb217c7f-3452-4e09-9fdf-3a248662aae3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/164414
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2016.1209171
dc.description.abstractOne hundred and seventy-two twin-pregnant patients were enrolled. The estimated foetal weight was calculated using 19 different formulas. Ong's formula (0.954 (95%CI=0.938/0.966)), which was designed specifically for twins, produced the highest Cronbach's alpha value followed by Hadlock II (0.952 (95%CI=0.935/0.965)), Hadlock I (0.952 (95%CI=0.935/0.964)), Hadlock III (0.952 (95%CI=0.935/0.964)), Hadlock IV (0.952 (95%CI=0.935/0.964)) and our formula (0.952 (95%CI=0.935/0.964)), which produced the same Cronbach's alpha values for twin A. For twin B, our formula produced the highest Cronbach's alpha value (0.961 (95%CI=0.948/0.972) followed by Hadlock II (0.960 (95%CI=0.946/0.971)), Hadlock I (0.960 (95%CI=0.946/0.970)), Hadlock III (0.960 (95%CI=0.946/0.970)) and Hadlock IV (0.960 (95%CI=0.946/0.970)). In conclusion, our formula (AC, FL) performed well in predicting the foetal weights in twin pregnancies (>24 weeks) in our study. However, it should be tested in other populations. Hadlock II (AC, FL) produced a comparable performance to Hadlock I (BPD, HC, AC, FL), Hadlock III (BPD, AC, FL) and Hadlock IV (HC, AC, FL). Hadlock II may be preferable in twin pregnancies since it is based on AC and FL only.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectObstetrics and Gynecology
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectKadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum
dc.subjectKADIN HASTALIKLARI & DOĞUM
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.titleA new mathematical formula to predict the foetal weight in twin pregnancies: A comparison of it with 19 different formulas
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentEtlik Zubeyde Hanim Gynecology Education & Research Hospital , ,
dc.identifier.volume37
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage53
dc.identifier.endpage57
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2512201


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record