Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSeven, Yasin B.
dc.contributor.authorAkalan, N. Ekin
dc.contributor.authorYucesoy, Can A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-06T12:50:30Z
dc.date.available2021-03-06T12:50:30Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationSeven Y. B. , Akalan N. E. , Yucesoy C. A. , "Effects of back loading on the biomechanics of sit-to-stand motion in healthy children", HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, cilt.27, ss.65-79, 2008
dc.identifier.issn0167-9457
dc.identifier.otherav_f5ccbfb2-86ec-43e6-a0aa-d2e899946d6e
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/161074
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2007.11.001
dc.description.abstractThe goal of the present study was to determine the thus far unstudied effects of back loading on the kinematics and kinetics of sit-to-stand (STS) motion in healthy children. Fifteen children (8 boys, 7 girls, mean age 9.6 years, SD 1.2 years) were tested with no back load and with a back load of 10% and 20% of body weight, respectively. A motion analysis system was used with six infrared cameras and two force plates. Total STS duration did not change; however, differential effects were shown for the durations of its phases. Back loading increased ankle dorsiflexion yielding a greater maximal dorsiflexion angle. Effects on the knee angle were limited except for a significant decrease in final knee flexion. Initial and maximal hip flexion increased but final hip angle did not change. Initial backward pelvic tilt decreased and a shift to forward pelvic tilt occurred at an earlier stage of STS motion. Back loading affected trunk motion: maximal and final forward shoulder tilt increased. Maximal ankle and knee moments and powers increased; however, hip joint kinetics was not affected significantly. Therefore, while maintaining the general pattern of STS motion, participants showed selectively significant adjustments to back loading during its different phases. The main kinematic adjustments were increased trunk flexion and greater ankle dorsiflexion, while the major kinetic adjustment was increased knee extension moment. Increased back loading yielded more pronounced effects, primarily in the ankle. In sum, back loading substantially affected the biomechanics of STS motion even for the lower load level studied. This finding may be of clinical relevance for musculoskeletal disorders, but this needs to be examined. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler (SOC)
dc.subjectSosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectDeneysel Psikoloji
dc.subjectSosyoloji
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.subjectSPOR BİLİMLERİ
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler Genel
dc.subjectPSİKOLOJİ, DENEYSEL
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler (SCI)
dc.subjectPsikoloji
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri (LIFE)
dc.subjectSinirbilim ve Davranış
dc.subjectNEUROSCIENCES
dc.titleEffects of back loading on the biomechanics of sit-to-stand motion in healthy children
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalHUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE
dc.contributor.departmentBoğaziçi Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume27
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage65
dc.identifier.endpage79
dc.contributor.firstauthorID69899


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record