Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSerengil, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorKilic, Umit
dc.contributor.authorUyger, Betul
dc.contributor.authorInan, Muhittin
dc.contributor.authorYurtseven, Ibrahim
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-06T08:34:54Z
dc.date.available2021-03-06T08:34:54Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationSerengil Y., Inan M., Yurtseven I., Kilic U., Uyger B., "Stream corridors as indicators of watershed land use: A case study in Istanbul", BOSQUE, cilt.33, ss.345-352, 2012
dc.identifier.issn0304-8799
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_e1aaa0bc-983d-438c-9f8b-fc539d4d6114
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/148558
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-92002012000300020
dc.description.abstractRiparian ecosystems as components of stream corridors provide a range of regulating ecosystem services including water production. Water quality, a component of water production is a major concern in urbanized watersheds. Water quality monitoring has been a very common method of investigating watershed impairment particularly in case of human impacts but it is now clear that hydrologic and ecological parameters may support and improve monitoring studies substantially. In three major watersheds of the Istanbul city (Alibeykoy, Sazlidere, and Kagithane) we initiated a large-scale study with the objective of evaluating integration, health, and functionality levels of riparian ecosystems. We combined a thorough field survey study with a GIS assessment to reach this objective. A total of 66 sub-watersheds have been selected in the main study watersheds and survey points have been determined at their outlets. All perennial streams in the study have been surveyed for 5 main categories; ecological water quality, water quality for use, riparian integrity, riparian functionality, and riparian habitat potential. We found that a substantial amount of the streams in or close to urban areas had lost their functionality. Furthermore, around 10 percent of all streams in the peri-urban areas had been channelled. Water quality has also been deteriorated in many streams. For example, average NO3-1 concentration at the urban streams was 76.63 mg L-1 while it was 2.67 mg L-1 at the forested part of the same watershed.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectMühendislik ve Teknoloji
dc.subjectÇevre Teknolojisi
dc.subjectÇevre Mühendisliği
dc.subjectOrmancılık
dc.subjectTarımsal Bilimler
dc.subjectBitki ve Hayvan Bilimleri
dc.subjectORMANCILIK
dc.subjectEKOLOJİ
dc.subjectTarım ve Çevre Bilimleri (AGE)
dc.subjectÇevre / Ekoloji
dc.subjectEkoloji ve Kirlenme
dc.titleStream corridors as indicators of watershed land use: A case study in Istanbul
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalBOSQUE
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage345
dc.identifier.endpage352
dc.contributor.firstauthorID67377


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster