Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEmre, M
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-06T08:30:39Z
dc.date.available2021-03-06T08:30:39Z
dc.identifier.citationEmre M., "Switching cholinesterase inhibitors in patients with Alzheimer's disease", INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, ss.64-72, 2002
dc.identifier.issn1368-5031
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_e14de7c5-1844-4a73-9d96-5ac59f7e406f
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/148344
dc.description.abstractDespite recognition that cholinesterase inhibitors can provide clinical benefits for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), the average durations of treatment and beneficial effects are not optimal in all cases. This may be due to disappointing efficacy or poor tolerability of the initial treatment, as well as secondary efficacy failure or adverse effects emerging during the maintenance phase. In such cases, pharmacological differences between available cholinesterase inhibitors provide a good rationale to switch to another drug in the same class. The pharmacological properties of rivastigmine, a dual inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase, and donepezil and galantamine, two AChE-selective inhibitors, are reviewed. Rivastigmine is reported to show brain- and brain region-selectivity. Donepezil appeared to be more selective for central than peripheral enzymes in rats. Galantamine and donepezil have also been shown to exert nicotinic receptor allosteric modulation in vitro, while rivastigmine has been shown to increase binding of acetylcholine to nicotinic receptors in the AD brain. Donepezil and galantamine are metabolised by the hepatic CYP450 system, whereas rivastigmine is metabolised by its target enzymes. Several switching studies indicated that a substantial proportion of patients who fail to benefit from treatment with donepezil could draw benefits after being switched to rivastigmine. An immediate switch from donepezil to rivastigmine was reported to be well tolerated and was not associated with cholinergic side effects. A post hoc analysis of a 5-month trial with galantamine showed that patients had similar efficacy outcomes, whether or not they had received prior anticholinesterase therapy, suggesting that a previous failure to respond to another cholinesterase inhibitor did not predict response to galantamine. On the basis of available data it is suggested that patients not tolerating or not responding to one particular cholinesterase inhibitor may still draw benefits upon switching to another.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectEczacılık
dc.subjectTemel Eczacılık Bilimleri
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.subjectFarmakoloji ve Toksikoloji
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri (LIFE)
dc.subjectFARMAKOLOJİ VE ECZACILIK
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectTIP, GENEL & İÇECEK
dc.titleSwitching cholinesterase inhibitors in patients with Alzheimer's disease
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE
dc.contributor.department, ,
dc.identifier.startpage64
dc.identifier.endpage72
dc.contributor.firstauthorID165116


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record