Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAKYILDIZ, ELİF ÜLKER
dc.contributor.authorAlbek, Emre
dc.contributor.authorKorkmaz, Gulay
dc.contributor.authorErsoy, Gokhan
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-06T07:53:29Z
dc.date.available2021-03-06T07:53:29Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationErsoy G., AKYILDIZ E. Ü. , Korkmaz G., Albek E., "Interinstitutional Review of Slides for Forensic Pathology Types of Inconsistencies", AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY, cilt.31, ss.222-226, 2010
dc.identifier.issn0195-7910
dc.identifier.otherav_de5a48a3-052f-4d18-a100-f1a26e390f31
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/146500
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/paf.0b013e3181deb863
dc.description.abstractBecause of the specific structure of forensic medicine in Turkey, reexamination of histopathologic specimens is a frequent practice. The aim of the present study is the assessment of microscopic diagnostic consistency in forensic pathology between different laboratories. Reports of the Council of Forensic Medicine between 2001 and 2004 were examined, and 150 cases with second pathologic examination were found. Results of histopathologic reports from peripheral laboratories were compared with those made by the Council pathologists with regard to diagnostic consistency. Consistency was assessed in 3 groups and 1 subgroup. Group 1, consistent and minor inconsistency; includes a major consistency subgroup. Group 2, major inconsistency, is the second diagnosis which is lethal; group 3, major inconsistency, is the first diagnosis which is lethal. The lung was found to be the organ with the highest frequency of diagnostic major inconsistency (group 2 and 3) and major consistency. Bronchopneumonia was the most common diagnosis. The brain had the highest frequency of intercenter diagnostic overall consistency (90.2%, group 1). Myocardial infarction was the diagnosis most frequently rejected on reevaluation (group 3). In conclusion, forensic pathology requires different experience than surgical ones. In cases of discrepancy between the anamnesis of the lethal event and pathologic findings, reevaluation of specimen is mandatory to avoid any diagnostic errors. Quality assurance systems with all include internal and external control mechanisms will improve the diagnostic reliability.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectTemel Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectBiyokimya
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectAdli Tıp
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectPatoloji
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri (LIFE)
dc.subjectBiyoloji ve Biyokimya
dc.subjectPATOLOJİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectTIP, YASAL
dc.titleInterinstitutional Review of Slides for Forensic Pathology Types of Inconsistencies
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalAMERICAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage222
dc.identifier.endpage226
dc.contributor.firstauthorID197364


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record