Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Taboas, Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorSar, Vedat
dc.contributor.authorStavropoulos, Pam
dc.contributor.authorLewis-Fernandez, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorMiddleton, Warwick
dc.contributor.authorDorahy, Martin J.
dc.contributor.authorBrand, Bethany L.
dc.contributor.authorKrueger, Christa
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T20:49:26Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T20:49:26Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationDorahy M. J. , Brand B. L. , Sar V., Krueger C., Stavropoulos P., Martinez-Taboas A., Lewis-Fernandez R., Middleton W., "Dissociative identity disorder: An empirical overview", AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, cilt.48, ss.402-417, 2014
dc.identifier.issn0004-8674
dc.identifier.otherav_d5fa85bd-6f26-43d1-b851-274457cba2d3
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/141222
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0004867414527523
dc.description.abstractObjective: Despite its long and auspicious place in the history of psychiatry, dissociative identity disorder (DID) has been associated with controversy. This paper aims to examine the empirical data related to DID and outline the contextual challenges to its scientific investigation. Methods: The overview is limited to DID-specific research in which one or more of the following conditions are met: (i) a sample of participants with DID was systematically investigated, (ii) psychometrically-sound measures were utilised, (iii) comparisons were made with other samples, (iv) DID was differentiated from other disorders, including other dissociative disorders, (v) extraneous variables were controlled or (vi) DID diagnosis was confirmed. Following an examination of challenges to research, data are organised around the validity and phenomenology of DID, its aetiology and epidemiology, the neurobiological and cognitive correlates of the disorder, and finally its treatment. Results: DID was found to be a complex yet valid disorder across a range of markers. It can be accurately discriminated from other disorders, especially when structured diagnostic interviews assess identity alterations and amnesia. DID is aetiologically associated with a complex combination of developmental and cultural factors, including severe childhood relational trauma. The prevalence of DID appears highest in emergency psychiatric settings and affects approximately 1% of the general population. Psychobiological studies are beginning to identify clear correlates of DID associated with diverse brain areas and cognitive functions. They are also providing an understanding of the potential metacognitive origins of amnesia. Phase-oriented empirically-guided treatments are emerging for DID. Conclusions: The empirical literature on DID is accumulating, although some areas remain under-investigated. Existing data show DID as a complex, valid and not uncommon disorder, associated with developmental and cultural variables, that is amenable to psychotherapeutic intervention.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectPsikiyatri
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.titleDissociative identity disorder: An empirical overview
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalAUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity Of Canterbury , ,
dc.identifier.volume48
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage402
dc.identifier.endpage417
dc.contributor.firstauthorID214522


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record