Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCollins, Alan S.
dc.contributor.authorUstaomer, Timur
dc.contributor.authorPickett, Elizabeth A.
dc.contributor.authorAndrew, Teo
dc.contributor.authorDixon, John E.
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, AHF
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T19:44:18Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T19:44:18Z
dc.identifier.citationRobertson A., Ustaomer T., Pickett E. A. , Collins A. S. , Andrew T., Dixon J. E. , "Testing models of Late Palaeozoic Early Mesozoic orogeny in Western Turkey: support for an evolving open-Tethys model", JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, cilt.161, ss.501-511, 2004
dc.identifier.issn0016-7649
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_d0aceca4-8f2a-423d-a563-c2ebbf909871
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/137933
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764903-080
dc.description.abstractField evidence from north-south transects tests three tectonic models for Tethys in Western Turkey for when a Late Palaeozoic ocean was closing and an Early Mesozoic ocean opening. In Model 1, a Palaeozoic ocean subducted southwards, rifting continental fragments from Gondwana and opening a Triassic Neo-Tethys to the south. Closure and collision occurred by latest Triassic time. In Model 2, a wide Palaeozoic Tethys subducted northwards with an active Eurasian margin and a passive Gondwana margin. The northern Gondwana margin rifted in the Triassic; fragments either remained nearby (Taurides) or drifted northwards (e.g. Karakaya) attached to a north-subducting plate. New oceanic crust replaced Palaeo-Tethys with Neotethys and back-arc marginal basins opened along the south Eurasian margin (e.g. Kure). In Model 3, a Palaeozoic ocean also subducted northwards opening wide marginal basins. A wide Southern Neotethys opened along the Gondwana margin. Rifted Eurasian (Anatolides) and Gondwana (Taurides) fragments collided in mid-Tethys by latest Triassic time. Field evidence from the Pontides supports north-dipping subduction models (Model 2 or 3 above). Key features are a south-vergent, HP-LT accretionary prism, magmatic are and back-are basin system bordering the Eurasian margin. Also, evidence from the Tauride Mountains favours Model 2 over Model 3. Critically, the Anatolides and Taurides appear to have a common history and were unlikely to have been located on opposite sides of Tethys, as in Model 3.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectMühendislik ve Teknoloji
dc.subjectJeoloji Mühendisliği
dc.subjectJEOLOJİ
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler (SCI)
dc.subjectYerbilimleri
dc.subjectYER BİLİMİ, MULTİDİSİPLİNER
dc.titleTesting models of Late Palaeozoic Early Mesozoic orogeny in Western Turkey: support for an evolving open-Tethys model
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY
dc.contributor.department, ,
dc.identifier.volume161
dc.identifier.startpage501
dc.identifier.endpage511
dc.contributor.firstauthorID41853


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record