Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKara, Dilan
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, Safa
dc.contributor.authorBAYDEMİR, CANAN
dc.contributor.authorTEKÇE, NESLİHAN
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T18:23:34Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T18:23:34Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationTEKÇE N., Tuncer S., Demirci M., Kara D., BAYDEMİR C., "Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Blocks to Dual-Cure Adhesive Cement: The Effect of Different Sandblasting Procedures", JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, cilt.28, 2019
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.otherav_ca22313c-d4fb-4d30-b791-37cc0ea922e3
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/133903
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12737
dc.description.abstractPurpose To investigate the effect of sandblasting powder particles on microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) of dual-cure adhesive cement to CAD/CAM blocks. Materials and Methods CAD/CAM blocks (Cerasmart, VITA, and LAVA) were cut in slabs and divided into groups: group 1, no sandblasting; group 2, sandblasted with 27-mu m Al2O3; group 3, sandblasted with 30-mu m CoJet; group 4, sandblasted with 50-mu m Al2O3. After sandblasting, all specimens were silanized and luted using dual-cure adhesive cement (G-CEM LinkForce). After 24 hours, bonded specimens were cut into 1 +/- 0.2 mm(2) sticks, and mu TBS values were obtained (N = 30). Additionally, 132 CAD/CAM block sections were prepared for surface roughness testing and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluations. Results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis One-way ANOVA and Dunn's Post Hoc Test (p 0.05). For LAVA, mu TBS values of specimens that were sandblasted with 50-mu m Al2O3 powder were significantly higher than 30-mu m-SiO2 and 27-mu m Al2O3 (p < 0.05). Conclusions The sand particles investigated (27-mu m Al2O3, 30-mu m SiO2, or 50-mu m Al2O3) did not significantly affect mu TBS results of CAD/CAM blocks for Cerasmart and VITA, although the results changed significantly for LAVA. The ideal bond protocol for CAD/CAM blocks is specific to the material used.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.titleMicrotensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Blocks to Dual-Cure Adhesive Cement: The Effect of Different Sandblasting Procedures
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi , Klinik Bilimler Bölümü
dc.identifier.volume28
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.contributor.firstauthorID262036


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster