dc.contributor.author | Kara, Dilan | |
dc.contributor.author | Tuncer, Safa | |
dc.contributor.author | BAYDEMİR, CANAN | |
dc.contributor.author | TEKÇE, NESLİHAN | |
dc.contributor.author | Demirci, Mustafa | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-05T18:23:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-05T18:23:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | TEKÇE N., Tuncer S., Demirci M., Kara D., BAYDEMİR C., "Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Blocks to Dual-Cure Adhesive Cement: The Effect of Different Sandblasting Procedures", JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, cilt.28, 2019 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1059-941X | |
dc.identifier.other | av_ca22313c-d4fb-4d30-b791-37cc0ea922e3 | |
dc.identifier.other | vv_1032021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/133903 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12737 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose To investigate the effect of sandblasting powder particles on microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) of dual-cure adhesive cement to CAD/CAM blocks. Materials and Methods CAD/CAM blocks (Cerasmart, VITA, and LAVA) were cut in slabs and divided into groups: group 1, no sandblasting; group 2, sandblasted with 27-mu m Al2O3; group 3, sandblasted with 30-mu m CoJet; group 4, sandblasted with 50-mu m Al2O3. After sandblasting, all specimens were silanized and luted using dual-cure adhesive cement (G-CEM LinkForce). After 24 hours, bonded specimens were cut into 1 +/- 0.2 mm(2) sticks, and mu TBS values were obtained (N = 30). Additionally, 132 CAD/CAM block sections were prepared for surface roughness testing and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluations. Results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis One-way ANOVA and Dunn's Post Hoc Test (p 0.05). For LAVA, mu TBS values of specimens that were sandblasted with 50-mu m Al2O3 powder were significantly higher than 30-mu m-SiO2 and 27-mu m Al2O3 (p < 0.05). Conclusions The sand particles investigated (27-mu m Al2O3, 30-mu m SiO2, or 50-mu m Al2O3) did not significantly affect mu TBS results of CAD/CAM blocks for Cerasmart and VITA, although the results changed significantly for LAVA. The ideal bond protocol for CAD/CAM blocks is specific to the material used. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.subject | Klinik Tıp | |
dc.subject | Diş Hekimliği | |
dc.subject | Sağlık Bilimleri | |
dc.subject | Tıp | |
dc.subject | Klinik Tıp (MED) | |
dc.subject | DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP | |
dc.title | Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Blocks to Dual-Cure Adhesive Cement: The Effect of Different Sandblasting Procedures | |
dc.type | Makale | |
dc.relation.journal | JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY | |
dc.contributor.department | İstanbul Üniversitesi , Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi , Klinik Bilimler Bölümü | |
dc.identifier.volume | 28 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | |
dc.contributor.firstauthorID | 262036 | |