Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBulus, Eser
dc.contributor.authorSenturk, Asli
dc.contributor.authorDelil, Sakir
dc.contributor.authorYeni, Naz
dc.contributor.authorKaraagac, Naci
dc.contributor.authorBolukbasi, Feray
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T17:34:14Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T17:34:14Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationBolukbasi F., Delil S., Bulus E., Senturk A., Yeni N., Karaagac N., "End of the barbexaclone era: an experience of treatment withdrawal", EPILEPTIC DISORDERS, cilt.15, ss.311-313, 2013
dc.identifier.issn1294-9361
dc.identifier.otherav_c629f29c-22ff-4535-869c-e67169471523
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/131391
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1684/epd.2013.0605
dc.description.abstractBarbexaclone is a salt compound of phenobarbital and propylhexedrine (a drug with indirect sympathomimetic properties). Due to the presence of the psychostimulating agent, propylhexedrine, this drug has less of a sedative effect and is well tolerated, compared to phenobarbital. Barbexaclone was widely used in Turkey until 2009 when its production ended, however, it gave rise to an epidemic for which we were not prepared. Since then, no standardised management protocol has been developed and each patient has been evaluated individually, thereby creating tailor-made solutions based on the extent of each patient's supply of remaining drug (from a few tablets to a stock which might last for six months). The rate of seizure freedom was 37.7% under barbexaclone treatment and dropped to 32.2% in the follow-up period after discontinuation of the drug. In the majority of cases, a new antiepileptic drug was added and this was commonly levetiracetam, a more expensive drug. In this article, we share our experiences of a general problem: the withdrawal of an antiepileptic drug from the market. Although there was prior notification regarding barbexaclone withdrawal, it was not possible to contact all patients since such a database is not available in Turkey. Although no conclusions regarding the efficacy of the drug or comparison of efficacy with other antiepileptic drugs is provided, it is nonetheless noteworthy to share these experiences since some patients had lost seizure control for reasons that could not be explained.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectNöroloji
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKLİNİK NEUROLOJİ
dc.titleEnd of the barbexaclone era: an experience of treatment withdrawal
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalEPILEPTIC DISORDERS
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage311
dc.identifier.endpage313
dc.contributor.firstauthorID210612


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record