Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCaniklioglu, C
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Y
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T15:03:27Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T15:03:27Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationCaniklioglu C., Ozturk Y., "Patient discomfort: A comparison between lingual and labial fixed appliances", ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, cilt.75, ss.86-91, 2005
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_ba285e8a-ad9e-4515-9906-a43c7f35a029
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/123808
dc.description.abstractThis study was undertaken to determine the discomfort differences between patients treated with lingual and labial orthodontic brackets. The study sample consisted of two groups of 30 adolescent patients. Group LI was treated with lingual appliances, and group LA was treated with labial appliances. After three months of treatment, each patient completed a seven-part survey with 12 questions, evaluating intraoral discomfort; tongue-lip-cheek soreness; eating, speech, and oral care difficulties; adaptation period; and general problems. In the LI group, tongue soreness and speech difficulties were significantly greater (P <.001) than in the LA group, whereas cheek (P <.001) and lip (P <.05) soreness were greater in group LA than in group LI. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in reported intraoral discomfort and eating and oral care difficulties, but adhering of food particles was greater (P <.05) in the LI group. In this study, speech difficulty was the most severe problem for the lingual group. All patients in the LA group and 76.7% of the patients in the LI group reported that the problem was solved at the end of 30 days. However, 23.3% of the LI group claimed that at the end of three months they were still having a problem while speaking. Even the maximum adaptation period was longer in the LI group (90 days) than in the LA group (30 days). General evaluation of this study suggested that after the initial discomfort period, only a small percentage (10%) of lingual orthodontic patients reported some hindrance because of their treatment.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.titlePatient discomfort: A comparison between lingual and labial fixed appliances
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalANGLE ORTHODONTIST
dc.contributor.department, ,
dc.identifier.volume75
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage86
dc.identifier.endpage91
dc.contributor.firstauthorID173774


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record