Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDogan, O
dc.contributor.authorSar, V
dc.contributor.authorYargic, LI
dc.contributor.authorTutkun, H
dc.contributor.authorAkyuz, G
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T13:26:42Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T13:26:42Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.citationAkyuz G., Dogan O., Sar V., Yargic L., Tutkun H., "Frequency of dissociative identity disorder in the general population in Turkey", COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, cilt.40, ss.151-159, 1999
dc.identifier.issn0010-440X
dc.identifier.otherav_b233ff6b-74b4-42ce-864b-d51af6656940
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/118723
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-440x(99)90120-7
dc.description.abstractThis study attempted to determine the prevalence of dissociative identity disorder in the general population. The Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) was administered to 994 subjects in 500 homes who constituted a representative sample of the population of Sivas City, Turkey. The mean DES score was 6.7 +/- 6.1 (mean +/- SD). Of the 62 respondents who scored above 17 on the DES, 32 (51.6%) could be contacted during the second phase of the study, They were matched for age and gender with a group of respondents who scored below 10 on the scale, and the Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule (DDIS) was then administered to both groups. Seventeen subjects (1.7%) received a diagnosis of dissociative disorder according to the structured interview. In the third phase, eight of 17 subjects who had a dissociative disorder on the structured interview could be contacted for a clinical evaluation. They were matched with a nondissociative control group and interviewed by a clinician blind to the structured interview diagnosis. Four of eight subjects were diagnosed clinically with dissociative identity disorder, yielding a minimum prevalence of 0.4%. Dissociative identity disorder is not rare in the general population. Self-rating instruments and structured interviews can be used successfully for screening these cases. Our data, derived from a population with no public awareness about dissociative identity disorder and no exposure to systematic psycho-therapy, suggest that dissociative identity disorder cannot be considered simply an iatrogenic artifact, a culture-bound syndrome, or a phenomenon induced by media influences, Copyright (C) 1999 by W.B. Saunders Company.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectPsikiyatri
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.titleFrequency of dissociative identity disorder in the general population in Turkey
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalCOMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY
dc.contributor.department, ,
dc.identifier.volume40
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage151
dc.identifier.endpage159
dc.contributor.firstauthorID122954


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record