Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTugrul, M
dc.contributor.authorKaradeniz, Hamide
dc.contributor.authorPembeci, Kamil
dc.contributor.authorSenturk, M
dc.contributor.authorAkpir, Kutay
dc.contributor.authorCamci, E
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T12:51:26Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T12:51:26Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.citationTugrul M., Camci E., Karadeniz H., Senturk M., Pembeci K., Akpir K., "Comparison of volume controlled with pressure controlled ventilation during one-lung anaesthesia.", British journal of anaesthesia, cilt.79, sa.3, ss.306-10, 1997
dc.identifier.issn0007-0912
dc.identifier.otherav_af454e1a-0f39-41d0-ac51-3d384fdc54af
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/116881
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/bja/79.3.306
dc.description.abstractPressure controlled ventilation (PCV) is an alternative mode of ventilation which is used widely in severe respiratory failure. In this study, PCV was used for one-lung anaesthesia and its effects on airway pressures, arterial oxygenation and haemodynamic state were compared with volume controlled ventilation (VCV). We studied 48 patients undergoing thoracotomy. After two-lung ventilation with VCV, patients were allocated randomly to one of two groups. In the first group (n=24), one-lung ventilation was started by VCV and the ventilation mode was then switched to PCV. Ventilation modes were performed in the opposite order in the second group (n=24). We observed that peak airway pressure (P=0.000001), plateau pressure (P=0.01) and pulmonary shunt (P=0.03) were significantly higher during VCV, whereas arterial oxygen tension (P=0.02) was significantly higher during PCV. Peak airway pressure (Paw) decreased consistently during PCV in every patient and the percentage reduction in Paw was 4-35% (mean 16.1 (SD 8.4) %). Arterial oxygen tension increased in 31 patients using PCV and the improvement in arterial oxygenation during PCV correlated inversely with preoperative respiratory function tests. We conclude that PCV appeared to be an alternative to VCV in patients requiring one-lung anaesthesia and may be superior to VCV in patients with respiratory disease.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectAnesteziyoloji
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectANESTEZİYOLOJİ
dc.titleComparison of volume controlled with pressure controlled ventilation during one-lung anaesthesia.
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalBritish journal of anaesthesia
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume79
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage306
dc.identifier.endpage10
dc.contributor.firstauthorID6459


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster